Thank you very much for the replies.
In terms of my understanding of the nature of planning permission and the conditions attached to it, I can entirely see how according to letter of the rules the building does need to be built according to the plans for which planning permission has been granted, with PD additions to be added later. However, in practice I still cannot see how this could ever be enforced: if they got a demolition order for the extension/dormer, then the moment it was demolished I could (quite legally) re-build the additions exactly as they were under PD rights anyway! And more importantly, I find it very hard to see the Planning Inspectorate upholding on appeal a council's decision to refuse retrospective planning permission to something which'd be permitted under PD. It'd be madness, would it not?
A very sensible question, but I have my reasons:
I have seen examples of where PD rights are often bizarrely much more generous than what planners will readily give planning permission for on new-builds, especially with dormer windows.
If the ground floor "extension" were included on the plans that means either I or a future owner would have rear extension PD rights on top of it, which is a prospect which might quite reasonably worry the planners (as my "extension" followed by an actual extension at a later date would be far too big!).
An interesting thought, thank you, but for reasons distinct to my project I'm not too worried about either of these issues.