BohoMT

I've just been looking at this in Cornwall. A recent planning application was granted for the demolition of a 2 bed bungalow, to be replaced with a 4 bed 2 storey house, footprint area was increased by circa 20% I'd guess. The bill for CIL is just under £50k (Bungalow was purchased for circa £280k). The CIL rate per m2 is £495 and it seems that deductions for demolitions can be made. The letter (available on the planning portal and dated 2nd September 2025 - Planning was granted in January 2025) states:- "We calculated this figure using the formula below as set out in Schedule 1 of the CIL Regulations 2010 (as amended): The CIL Total Area Charge = Chargeable Area (A) x Rate (R) x Index (I) The Chargeable Area is the gross internal area of the total development less the floorspace of any existing buildings which are eligible deduction. To be eligible for deduction, the existing buildings must be situated on the relevant land on the day planning permission first permits the chargeable development and be 'In Use'. A building is defined as being 'In Use' if part of the building has been in continuous use for a period of at least six months within the period of three years ending on the day planning permission first permits the chargeable development." The developer has had issues with access and now CIL and has placed the property back on the market, untouched but now with Planning. I havent read the exemptions or relief aspects of the Cornwall Council plans yet.

Thank-you. Wow, 6 year battle and no refund, what a pain, glad you got the correct band eventually.

We live in a rented house next door, so this house we have inherited, is classed as our second home and therefore second home council tax uplift has been applied, and it is allegedly Class G!! We are paying 300% council tax despite the only house we 'own' being unfurnished, uncarpeted and essentially uninhabitable at present. We are appealing against this and also applying for a re-banding of the property.

Thanks and yes, it was an old piggery so windows were not very plentiful. The builder also ran out of money it seems which may have impacted upon the number of openings that were formed.

Our NT representative is a nice guy and has been relatively helpful however they are petrified of legal challenge so say very little. Good advice thanks, and we have an appointment with solicitors tomorrow morning. Not listed which is a bonus.

Where to start! Levels were messed up so including the odd step, all floors slope significantly and I spotted in old planning drawings that they had miscalculated the levels to the tune of circa +150mm across the ground floor. Bathroom is 1.4m wide with a bath taking up 0.7m of that so you have to open the door, squeeze up against basin, close the door to access the WC. Weird eaves detail which is great for ventilation and vermin access. Internal balcony made out of an old pulpit to give almost an open loft access / weird space off the main bedroom accessed by a spiral staircase from the middle of the bedroom. All windows understandably rotten as single glazed softwood throughout. The site has great uninterrupted views of the sea so the only window on that elevation is a 600 x 600 bathroom window. Foul drains run from garage / utility type situation under the 'new' build part of the conversion, with rodding eyes / inspection covers in the concrete floor of the internals, despite there being a big site and plenty of soakaways and septic tank availability. Everywhere is so dark that internal lights required on all but brightest days. Bed 2 has a back door which makes it more use as a hallway. It's honestly so weird. It seems that the National Trust were even more skint in the 80's so were happy to let any one take on old crumbling barns and convert them to minimal standards and as cheaply as possible, to get the asset liability off their books. On the positive, the site is large and plenty of working space, and no significant damp. Dont get me wrong, we are so grateful, but wow this sometimes feels like a poison chalice. Doing everything (new build & refurb) is just not affordable to us without significant borrowing so plan is to build new alongside, join up, move in, then refurb remainder over time.

Hi Everyone, What a wealth of knowledge on this site, and all very helpful. We have recently inherited a property which is an amazing gift, and it is an amazing plot, but...... the property is a late 80's barn conversion, and not a good conversion at that, so drastic change is required to make it habitable again. The property is a long lease (74 years remaining) with National Trust the landlord, however the property is eligible for a 999 year long lease (or virtual freehold) under the leasehold reform act due next year but we are not holding our breath that the proposed 2026 target for this reform will be achieved. Our thinking at present is partial demolition and build a new effectively self contained block with a link to the existing and then refurb that post new build. National Trust have been to visit and are open to discussion which is great because the lease terms are quite onerous as they stand now. We would like to get a new element built to enable us to move in and halve our bills and then refurb the existing element of the house. Then we have a small matter of planning within the AONB status and a (rightly) rigorous Local Plan, but a lovely challenge from a sadly departed very good friend. Good fun ahead, apart from the 200% Council Tax bill we have recently received!