EinTopaz

I’ll give that a try. But I know already from testing that the 90% range rated test I tried yesterday took 5 mins longer to get To target. Still overshot but only by 3.6c this time. But then weirdly never did make its way down to 60. It settled at 62.5 with a modulated output of 54% I assume the higher modulated % was because it was a colder day and the pipes are in the subfloor with the ventilated air bricks etc. so assume it was just working a little harder to keep them at temp. Or above! EDT ^ this was all on pump setting 5, which was essentially locking it at 87% pump speed

The whole house does have an insulated 75mm cavity. When you say resting on the bay window do you mean ontop of the window frames? Or is it likely to have a flat roof built into the bay window? Trying to work out how invasive this will be to replace. Looking at the floor heights internally I doubt it’s cantilevered to them either. I know from when they converted it from a bungalow to what it is now they kept the original downstairs ceilings in place and built another cavity above that, so every bedroom in the upstairs has a step up by maybe 120mm to the “higher” floor height. That’d be way higher than where the bay roof would be cantilevered from though.

I’d assume so yes. But from eyeballing it looks like where the masonry the frame would be bolted to would be. Is a void for some reason.

It’s not no, renovated in the past 15 years but it’s originally a 1955 bungalow. So these bays would’ve originally run into the roof / eaves. When it’s been extended upward I wonder what they decided to do with the bays to convert them. I guess we will find out when the soffits and fascia’s are removed but I’m still a bit confused/concerned as to why I’m seeing a void above the bay. is it likely the bay window here won’t have its own flat roof built in? As in when we swap it out for a new window, it’ll be a straight forward swap of the vertical units?

Thanks Nick, that's exactly what i'd expect to see, a continuous external brick surface with brick gaps where the timber framework for the roof is fixed to the floor joists. I guess more will be revealed when I remove the soffits and fascias but it definitely looks like a big void where i've marked on blue in the above image. Certainly more than a brick's worth. Though thats just from eye balling it through the gaps between the brick and soffits. Re: The bay forming some structural strength. Do the bay windows like this one come with a flat portion on top that's built into the window when it's fitted? I forgot to add an interior image in the original post but attached it below here. In our case will each of the panes be directly fixed to the circular section above it on that interior image? Or will the bay have a flat roof section built into it? And will that circular section above it have to be removed when we replace the bay window? It looks to my eye like each pane is just fixed directly to it, but i really am not familiar with the construction of the bay windows.

Yep, I’m trying it on pump 5 for today’s tests and have rated the boiler down to 90% just to see if it helps the over shooting / taking ages to modulate down…. will do pump 0 “proportional” tomorrow. though looking at the manual again I wonder if there’s an error here. In the diagram it clearly shows that the “max” pump rate (A) is far higher than pump setting 6. Though when I ran it on 6 last time. The pump % output constantly read at 100%. So it’s just another thing I’m confused by honestly. 400mbar and 700mbar is a huuuge difference if we’re to believe this diagram.

Hi all, Noticed something I thought was odd on our bay windows, and wanted to check for sanity. Wasn't sure if this was best in the roofing or Window sub category so will delete and re-post if this is in the wrong place, apologies if so. Anyway, Two of our ground floor bay windows are this sort of setup, where the brickwork beneath them projects out from the property with the window, but the brickwork above the bay window does not. I was looking at having the Windows,fascias and soffits replaced and on inspection earlier today I noticed the area directly above the window appears to be a recess, where the brickwork just stops. Its hard to see clearly without ripping off the soffits etc. But my question is, if I was to remove the soffits and fascias and all the little 'roof' section above the bay window here, if it was 'built' properly should I expect to see a lintel on the inner skin and the rest just solid brick work? Or is it correct to have a big recessed void between the brickwork above where the baywindow is? Tried to draw what I'm describing on my phone on the image below. Red is where the bricks carry on, blue void. Cheers Ged

Ok, so First things first, when The boiler is set back to factory defaults, my defaults are not the same as what's in the manual. My defaults are 2-A1 = 0 2-A2 = 1 In this configuration I don't get the option for 2-A3 or 2-A4. 2-A1 makes sense, I don't have a LLH. But 2-A2 have manually set to 0 because i dont have any hot water linked up to this boiler, no cylinder, no DHW, just central heating. When I set 2-A2 to 0, Magically I get the option then of 2-A3 being available. But it only gives me the options 0 and 1 in there. Which is completely inconsistent with the manual. in the manual there isnt even an option for setting "1" in 2-A3 Also, in 2-A2, i get the options of 0, 1 or 3..... which again is inconsistent with the manual, no idea what option 3 is in 2-A2 2-A4, no matter what I set in 2-A1, A2 or A3.... I can never get 2-A4 to appear, so I simply ignore it. SO yes, its a complete and utter mess. WB have told me to just try different configurations with it. And I have. But its never made any sense to me any of this. I've tried these configs below A1 - 0 A2 - 1 ------ A1- 0 A2 - 0 A3 - 0 ------ A1-0 A2-0 A3-1 None seemed to make a massive difference.

Hey guys, sorry ive been away for a few days. Yes one more update, i've been running it at different pump speeds to see which I like best. First set of data logging I tried was pump speed 6 (400mbar constant pressure). This was the setting it tripped on on Xmas day. I since tried pump speed 4 (300mbar constant pressure) it didn't trip out on this setting and didn't seem to take much longer to heat the rads up. Though the dt was 5c greater for most of the operation compared to pump speed 6. Yesterday I tried pump speed 3 (250mbar constant pressure), the flow still got to 60c in 25mins, but the radiators did take notably longer to get hot. Like a good 10-15mins longer, and even more so for the triple column ones. It did not trip out on this setting either, got to 65.5c, and modulated down at a slightly quicker rate than the tests previous. So it is still overshooting target massively, and sometimes tripping out, but mostly taking 30-45mins of time to get from its overshot of target, back to target. With regards to the L2 settings, it's a bit of a saga. I'll make a separate post of it, because its a head scratcher. Though TLDR is i've tried all the obvious configurations in there and it hasnt appeared to make too much of a difference. Will post below.

What would be reasonable next steps then guys? get WB out again and show them that it's going way beyond target and fingers crossed I can get it to trip out on the day? As it stands they have swapped out the pump, sensors, Hex, and they did the board last Monday too. Not sure what else to do other than keep running it with slower pump speeds and seeing if that fixes anything. I have noticed a whole bunch of weird inconsistencies in the manual, particularly in the L2 hydraulic settings, the settings on my boiler are not consistent with the ones in the manual. But WB told me because i simply have flow/return/Gas and no cylinder or diverter etc, then it doesnt really matter about L2.... again not sure if im being palmed off there again or they're right on that one.

https://www.worcester-bosch.co.uk/support/literature/download/release/6720883858/45568 Goes into the settings from around Page 51.

Yep makes sense, I couldn’t get it to trip this time. I have a feeling the trip is +6c on this boiler. It went up to 65.6c in today’s test. When it does trip again though I’ll be able to confirm the 3-b3 setting above. I’ve set it to -2now. So I’m expecting the behavior to be… if/when it next trips above target, it’ll drop to 58 then fire up again. Where’s at -10 I suspect it waited all the way down to 50 before firing up again. That’d explain the gap where I wasn’t monitoring yesterday. But yeah the larger concern is… why is it exceeding target by nearly 10% at all?! Perhaps I should range rate it down too to maybe like 85% max and see if that affects heat up time / and / or helps this over shooting issue.

id have thought so. But looking at the data I logged side by side with the previous test. It reached target temp around about the same time. All rads felt hot. The only difference was the dt was mostly around 25 rather than 20 in the test previous. Whether that’s better or worse. I couldn’t say. edit: previous test was pump setting 6 at 400mbar, this test was pump setting 4 at 300mbar

Image didn't attach, its this one, i thought that meant "target can be exceeded by this many degrees before it turns the burner off" but on reading and testing again I dont think it means that. I think that threshold is hard coded to the boiler and what this option means is "after the burner has turned off from overshooting, how far do you want the temp to drop before the burner re-ignites?" I'm fairly confident it means that now.

HIVE. Just using the boost function it. As far as I know it doesn’t do any modulating itself. Just on/off im running the heating again now with a lower pump speed. It hasn’t tripped off this time which is annoying. Target still 60. It over shot to 65.5 and is still at 65.5 now 20 mins after reaching target With lower pump speed the flow / return dt was closer to 25 than 20 for the most part. It’s now at 18. Or so.

Hey, hope you all had a lovely Christmas. Ours was lovely despite the boiler still playing up after all this. I ran it yesterday with exactly the same settings as previous, got to target of 60'c in 25mins like last time. I had to nip out to go get the family, came back 10mins later and the boiler was down at 51c again, and a really low output % on the burner. I never got to witness it happen but in the past this is because it's exceeded the target temp by > the set threshold and turned the burner off for 2mins. It's annoying I never was logging the data for that run but i'll do another today and see if I can replicate it. If it did do that then the issue from my last post where it was taking a while to modulate down despite going 5c over target...appears to be getting worse, as in its going higher and higher over target each time, i'll confirm that today. EDIT: Infact looking at the settings, I did change one thing, I raised what I thought was the threshold before it would trip out, from 6c to 10c. I think that's what this setting is for anyway in the image below. Maybe I misunderstood it.

thanks for the data again on that John. RE: the 25mins to 60'c yeah Im happy with that. It's more the fact its going so far beyond target and still not modulating down for a while that's concerning me. It has took a turn for the worst again on Christmas day, will make a separate post below as it's a bit meatier.

Ok, gave it a whirl and logged the temps and burner/pump outputs at each interval too. TLDR it did run well but overshot the target by 5c and stayed there for a while whilst modulating down slowly. Some things worth noting before looking at the data below. I set the pump setting back to pump 6, the highest constant pressure setting, rather than setting 0 (which makes it relative to the burner). Now that the HEX is fixed, I did want to try that to see if it ran well and still got everything hot etc. Also worth noting the target temp on this run was set to 60'c On for 5minutes Flow 30.6 return 15.6 Burner 62% Pump 93% On 15 minutes Flow 50.9 return 29.0 Burner 100% Pump 100% On 25 minutes (target temp reached) Flow 60.1 return 39.1 Burner 100% Pump 100% On 30 minutes Flow 63.2 return 42.8 Burner 95% Pump 100% On 35 minutes Flow 64.8 return 46.4 Burner 85% Pump 100% On 45 minutes Flow 64.8 return 50.2 Burner 65% Pump 100% On 55 minutes Flow 61.9 return 50.7 Burner 49% Pump 100% big time gap now as I stopped measuring till it settled to actual target temp of 60'c On 1h35mins Flow 59.9 return 47.8 burner 49% pump 100% Lastly, I did two lots of measures on the meter, first set when the boiler was at 100% and second set when it had settled to 49% 100% meter readings (in m3 meter cubed) 0mins - 7293.39 3 mins - 7293.56 6mins - 7293.74 49% meter readings ( in m3 meter cubed 0mins -7296.14 3mins -7296.22 6mins -7296.31 What do you guys think? To me im not sure why it's staying above target for so long before it starts modulating down. If the greenstar 8000 has no return sensor, i wonder what is making it think it needs to stay so hot at such high % long after target is achieved?

Will give it a try tonight. It’s going to be hard to get an accurate reading from start up as it’s output % does change quite for the first 10 mins from start up. It goes higher and higher. I’ll wait for it to settle at a high % then do the 3 min tests.

Thanks John, does the boiler need to be at target temperature when I do these tests or does that not matter?

Gave it another run last night. Still on pump setting 0 (relative to the burner setting) and locked in a range of 60-100% min/max for the pump too. It got to target of 60'c within about 30mins. All rads hot by then and measuring around the same on the flow pipes for each of them. So all fine. The not fine bit is it stayed at a max output on the burner for 30mins after reaching target temp. Then took another 30mins after that to very slowly modulate down to 60%. So that feels like its not modulating down soon enough. Or that the system really needs the boiler to be on 100% even to maintain the target temp of 60'c... which i'd be very surprised by. So to test the latter, I tried it again but range rated it down to 75%, it took longer to get to target, but then frustratingly didn't drop from 75% once it got to target, it did exactly the same as it did when it was rated to 100%, just stayed on 'max' for half hour after hitting target, then dropped. So in conclusion, if it can raise the temp to target at 75%... why would it think it needs to stay at 100% to maintain the target? What exactly is telling the boiler to modulate down on the greenstar 8000 life?

He never did no, they brought a new board with them. But he said that replacement is for the older version of my boiler that suffered from a different set of problems, mainly something to do with the boiler idling for long periods of time when there's a clear demand, mine never had that as it's the newer physical version of the same boiler. So he only changed the HEX. I will do some logging now that the boiler is reading 1:1 with the flow pipe. I can try all the different pump settings which previously due to the issue I was having made it unclear which was the correct set of settings. I should easily be able to monitor and decide on that now though.

We're closer to the former of those two, but honestly we just boost it if and when rather than on a schedule. When the house feels chilly we boost it for a few hrs.

Yep could be. Though It is strange there is no increase there, as the flow pipe and rads were all measuring 10'c hotter than before the HEX was changed. So its definitely outputting hotter water than it was before.

What would that suggest for next steps? Certainly the rads are getting hotter than before the HEX was replaced. So that’s good. Wil the rest be down to trying diff pump settings and balancing?