Jump to content

Lintel Woes

Members
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Lintel Woes's Achievements

New Member

New Member (2/5)

0

Reputation

  1. Thanks for your detailed and helpful responses. He sent a labourer today to drop the blockwork and remove the lintel. I got stuck in to help as lowering the blocks from and cleaning up takes time on your own never mind removing the lintel. Labourer is one who’s been on job from day one and was fine with us, he said builder told him we had to feel safe and understood our reasoning and apologised for the oversight. We are away for a couple of days so have text a few details to the builder and we will see what happens: I will try to ring him when cameras let me know he’s on site tomorrow. Once again thanks to all who replied. P.S it may be that the engineering bricks are not exactly the same height in the middle but either way I think it was doubtful that the doors would have fit in the vertical.
  2. The external dimensions are 4300 x 3200 and yes the roof will be a dual pitch I.e ridge at the top in the centre. They are putting an I-beam steel in for the ridge. The lintel code is covered up but appears to be 1 block high roughly 210mm and 290mm wide. Ridge height is approx 4300mm
  3. Thanks for the replies I will get the measurements tomorrow and answer your questions. The door is a upvc slider with fixed panels ether side.
  4. Ashamed to say no, it’s replacing a wooden conservatory that was falling down. It will serve as a garden room with existing UPVC doors to main house remaining. just concerned about weight of roof that’s all, we will be spending a lot of time in there as a playroom for our 1year old.
  5. Thanks for confirming my suspicions Dave. The lintel above the door has 3 courses of blocks and then is to have a traditional vaulted ceiling roof with slate finish. Not sure if that has any influence on the spec of the lintel? He has put some damp course barrier into the wall above the lintel which to me seems a little short to set under a block and asked what colour wall weeps we wanted when here on Thursday. we were quoted 24800 for the knockdown and rebuild build which included digging out the old floor and replacing the footings with a raft with a ground beam and mesh reinforcment rather foolishly agreed to giving him 55% deposit and he got 3300 after the concrete pour. We are in an awkward spot as don’t have enough money left to complete the build if he walks off the job. They are a polite bunch when on site but impossible to contact when they are not here, texts calls unanswered etc. I fear this is a harsh lesson to learn but we need to try and work with them to get this done rather than kicking them off the job.
  6. We are having an existing outbuilding rebuilt as the old one was falling down. There are 3 window openings and a sliding door opening. The window openings are 610mm, 1210mm and 1610mm wide, with the door opening at 2810mm. The builder has brought the catnic lintels (for 100m cavity walls) to site and they are 900mm, 1400mm, 1800mm and 3000mm wide. He's installed the 1400 one above the 1210mm opening, and has partially installed the 3m one above the main door. My concerns are: These lintels (except for the 900mm) do not give a bearing size of 150 either side. I thought openings below 1200 could be 100mm but not above 1200. Also catnic specify 150mm bearing widths? I'm especially worried about the one for 2.8m wide doors where the opening width should be 2810mm. He's only made the width 1790mm and when quizzed he said he would open it up when the rest of the build was done before installing the door. The lintel seems to have a bearing width of 105mm on one side and 100mm on the other - and it is this side he plans to cut out 20mm to increase the opening width to 2810mm. The walls are block work with 100mm cavity. I noticed today that on Thursday he had built three courses of blocks above the lintel on inside wall only, and despite having props on site has not bothered to support the lintel. On the outside wall there are no blocks above the lintel over the bearing pads which has caused the lintel to lift clean off the pads on the outer wall side. I could slide a slate through the gap. Also the blockwork on the inside wall above the lintel has cracked along the pointing and the lintel is 8mm lower to the floor in the centre than at the edges. What should we say to the builder when we see him next?
×
×
  • Create New...