Jump to content

Why insulate


Russell griffiths

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

It's a digression, but I think your logic is arse over tit with that statement. 

If someone lights a fire now and then youd still rather a lifetime of high and higher fuel bills :S

 

Not me :/. I'd go passive in the wink of an eye. Then all the money your used to throwing at the energy companies can be thrown to your mortgage instead. It's a no-brained afaic.  

I hate the house we're in, as I'm paying to keep it warm and like @Onoff I can literally hear the meters going round whilst I continue to pump heat in to offset its draughty inefficient ways, but capital expenditure puts any sensible anti-measures in place. :(

I'm not saying I want to use a wood burner and live in a draughty house. I built the house I'm in now last year 150mm cav, double glazing, gsh no wood burning! Was easy to build, bills are low ish and mortgage lenders will readily lend on it when I decide to sell. It's perfectly logical really and just depends how much you value your time. 

 

You have a good understanding of the mechanical aspects from your trade so you might enjoy the concept of passive. I wasn't knocking anyone who does it at all but just admitting it's beyond me and my efforts are better spent elsewhere. I think @joe90 is about where I'd want to be next time I build one for myself. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JSHarris said:

 

I have external finned vents and the intake one regularly clogs with cobwebs and fluffy seeds.  The "old man's beard" fluff seem the worst of the fluffy seeds, as there is loads of it in the hedges around here and I'm forever having to get up a ladder and brush the intake grille clear.  Being able to do this from ground level would be a lot easier.

@JSHarris what about one of these with a brush or even a roller attached and maybe a set of steps to reach up if needed.

https://www.screwfix.com/p/harris-3-section-aluminium-extension-pole-3m/10063

Edited by Declan52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to go passive but I'd want a traditional, "solid", feature exterior like maybe @sussexlogs with all the flint detailing. 

 

You MUST have a partner who is willing to buy into it. Best I can hope for without a major windfall is a slow, torturous raft of improvements on what I have. 

 

money-pit.jpg.a2590394d426a62d926017fa9ad9ee1a.jpg

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what we need to do is de-mystify the whole low energy house building thing.  I'm guilty of using science and technology here that helps some, but probably confuses and puts off others, and I'm not the only one.

 

We've had step changes in house building many times over the centuries, from wood and mud huts, to stone houses, then, more recently the introduction of cavity walls and damp proof courses, and more recently still the incorporation of insulation in houses from new (our old house that was built in the late 70's early 80's had no insulation at all, for example).

 

There's nothing magical about making a more energy efficient house, it's just that solving one problem tends to create a need to solve other problems that arise.  This is no different to things like the introduction of cavity walls, they solved the problem of water penetration but created another problem - much higher heat loss than some thick solid walled houses.  Our first cavity wall house was icy when compared to the several hundred year old stone cottages we'd lived in before, for example.

 

We're still working through the solutions to the problems created by reducing heat loss, like needing to provide MVHR because we've improved airtightness to reduce unwanted ventilation heat loss, or needing to fit vapour control barriers on the inside of houses because we've improved the wall and roof insulation to the point where interstitial condensation can be a risk.

 

Gradually, all these things will just naturally migrate into normal building practice, much as the fitting of central heating to houses has.  I bet there were a lot of people who felt that central heating was complicated and unnecessary addition when it first came out.

Edited by JSHarris
typo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Declan52 said:

@JSHarris what about one of these with a brush or even a roller attached and maybe a set of steps to reach up if needed.

https://www.screwfix.com/p/harris-3-section-aluminium-extension-pole-3m/10063

 

 

I have a Heath Robinson alternative, I stand on a step ladder and the stiff yard broom can just reach, and does a reasonable job of cleaning the fins!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Oz07 said:

Btw @Nickfromwales how much is your annual gas and leccy? Going on what plumbers charge at the minute I bet you earn it in a week or two! Mines around 5/600, 3 days of your time sir!

 

Like I said earlier just done £900 on oil (no gas). That's without leccy. About £2K a year here.

 

With my boy at uni i.e more space and his room spare I often half consider putting a scaffold over the whole place then redoing the roof then re-jigging the dormer to temporarily include a kitchen and living room. Then gut downstairs in one hit. Blitz the exterior and go 3G / EWI. 

 

It's only having to do a day job and the lack of £££ stopping me! :)

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Government is set against widespread fuel efficient homes/cars as it risks losing revenue on a massive scale.

 

Whoever invents small scale point of use hydrogen generation or similar from good old H2O is on borrowed time. Conspiracy theorists say it's already happened. Check out the Paul Pantone and Stanley Meyer stories. :(

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Governments have always been creative when it comes to generating taxes.  Before we had things like cars to tax, there were taxes on things like windows, for example - the more windows you had in your house, the more tax you paid.

 

At one time or another governments have taxed just about everything going, so I'm sure they can come up with ways to raise revenue if they start losing it from fuel taxation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JSHarris said:

A tree that falls and decays naturally releases CO2 at a rate that's pretty close to the uptake rate of the living trees around it.

It does not convert all stored carbon to CO2 and CH4. Around 40% becomes relatively inert "soil" that is one of the largest carbon stores we have.  It is about 5% by mass in the first 100mm of soil depth (Upson et al, 2016),  reforestation of pastoral land is even better.  SO planting new trees is a better idea that managing existing forests.

There is also a lot of scope to vary the types of trees planted if you want to sequester carbon in soil, but balancing growth rate, decomposition rate and leaf fall.  That is before plantation location is considered.

 

As for the 'black helicopters'.  Whenever @JSHarris mates fly over Porthleven heading towards Goldsithney or Relubus (where SarahSW lives, what happened to her), I think of this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Simplysimon said:

only thing mdf is good for ! :ph34r:

 

Slander ! Libel !

 

It was only last week that I bought an 18mm sheet of MDF at B&Q for £19.50 (reduced to £19.36 by B&Q Trade Discount). (*)

 

The nice man on the saw cut it into 11 slices of 3, 4 or 5 inches for me, to make radiator shelves (to prevent Tenants drying washing on radiators) and door liners.

 

F

 

* I shall treat myself to one two-finger KitKat with that.

 

Edited by Ferdinand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nickfromwales said:

No more Speckled Hen for you tonight. ;)  

 

I'll have you know I've been dry for 3 weeks now. No particular reason why...old man was in hospital so I couldn't / wouldn't drink and drive, then I had man flu. Just haven't had the urge. 

 

The Cobra, Doom Bar & Whitstable Bay Pale Ale in the fridge have just sat there. They're not even calling to me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back on thread...

 

If you EWI a traditional house what's the score with trying to mitigate heat loss where internal walls come up or is it something you just live with? Say like mine with suspended timber floors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Onoff said:

Back on thread...

 

If you EWI a traditional house what's the score with trying to mitigate heat loss where internal walls come up or is it something you just live with? Say like mine with suspended timber floors.

 

Depends how you have insulated it.

 

A skirt would keep them warm, assuming no side draughts. /metaphor

 

If you have cross flow then you probably have to suck it up.

 

Gable walls into the attic may lose more heat by conduction, as the ground is warm.

Edited by Ferdinand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been a lot of EWI applied up here, mostly to social housing. They always seem to take the EWI right down to ground level. They also seem to cover any air bricks in the process.  Obe can only wonder what trouble this is storing up for the future.

 

A suspended timber floor can be well insulated, but unless you have a really good crawl space, you would not want to do it from underneath, in fact you would not want to even wit a good crawl space. It really is a boards up in every room job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...