Jump to content

Steel RSJs advice please


Recommended Posts

Hello.

We are currently self managing our 2 storey house extension  (1930s semi).  We have had calculations done for the steel by a structural engineer but the builder thinks that the calculations are wrong. To me they are a bunch of numbers and I really don't have a clue what it means. Basically we are knocking down 2 internal walls. 1 is in the same direction of the joists and has no wall directly above it. 1 is load bearing. Then we have the external wall where the SE has said we only need 1 steel beam butting in even though it's a double skim wall. Both architect and builder say we need 2 on this wall. I feel as though we've paid £250 for SE and he's a bit offended that we've questioned it but I don't know who to trust? Any advice welcome please. 

Screenshot_20171024-101957.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that the concern from your architect and builder is simply that the two masonry leafs of your external cavity wall each need a support and the single beam that your engineer has specified is not wide enough on the top flange to provide a support to each of the two leafs.

 

Typically each leaf of the external wall will be 100mm thick and they will be spaced apart by the width of the cavity with steel cavity ties so that the wall acts as a single structural unit. Typically these cavity walls are between 250mm and 300mm wide.

 

If your engineer has specified a single I beam it would mean that the top flange of your steel beam would need to be 250-300mm wide to match the width of your cavity wall. I think your architect and builder are suggesting that two separate beams would be a more practical solution  - ie two beams, each 100mm wide for the 2 leafs of the cavity wall.

Edited by Ian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jude3003 said:

Thank you Ian that does make sense now. Do you have any advice as to weather we need to have steel put in the wall which runs the same way as the joists and not load bearing? Again SE says yes but builder is adamant no. 

 

Is it supporting anything...? If not, you don't need a steel....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, PeterW said:

 

Is it supporting anything...? If not, you don't need a steel....

No, directly above it is floor only then about a metre away there is a stud wall, but the SE has calculated for a steel? This is why I'm confused - I would hope the SE knows what he was talking about but I'm beginning to think otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jude3003 said:

No, directly above it is floor only then about a metre away there is a stud wall, but the SE has calculated for a steel? This is why I'm confused - I would hope the SE knows what he was talking about but I'm beginning to think otherwise.

I agree with Peter.

In the situation you described with the floor joists running parallel to the wall  you would normally only need a steel beam if the wall carried on up through the first floor.

 

Possible exceptions - the existing ground floor wall will be providing restraint (extra stiffness) to the other ground floor walls that intersect with it. When removing a wall like that sometimes its necessary to provide something to replace the restraint that you lose when removing the wall. Usually its done by leaving a small wall stub at the intersections but occasionally I've also seen engineers provide this restraint via the use of extra steel.

Edited by Ian
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...