Jump to content

Eating worm monster arrived


readiescards

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Hastings said:

£4650+VAT for the 8pe Clearfox.

The USP of no electricity is lost there.  My Conder was under £2K  The £2650 saved will pay for the electricity it uses for the rest of my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I lived for years (until mains drains came to the street) very close to a Biodisc Klargester we shared with another house. It had no dedicated air vent, so it received enough oxygen via the outlet pipe to the stream and inlet pipe from the 2 houses it served, and it never smelled. Therefore I am puzzled as to why any treatment unit should need a vent at all.

 

My unit will be in a very windy exposed spot in the Hebrides where lack of enough oxygen entering the tank will not be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JSHarris said:

 

We have a Biopure unit, with an air blower..... There's no smell at all from it that I've been able to detect.  We have no vents on the foul drain that runs down to it, just the vent on the top of the lid.

 

But is there not a vent stack pipe at roof level at the house that allows air into or out of it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Hastings said:

£4650+VAT for the 8pe Clearfox.

Plus I bet nearly another £500 installing it. It needs a big hole and lots of gravel. Or less gravel if you prefer to dig two smaller holes.

 

To be clear there is only a very slight aroma (a sweet smell) from the actual Clearfox vent pipe of you stick your nose within about an inch of it. And the output is a nearly clear liquid which is also pretty odourless.

 

The more unpleasant odour seems to come from the sludge collection tank. Yet I can't identify where. My nose seems to adapt to the smell after a few sniffs making identifying the source hard in a nearly always breezy site.

 

At the time of installation I was planning to live off-grid hence zero electric consumption was very important

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hastings said:

 

But is there not a vent stack pipe at roof level at the house that allows air into or out of it?

 

 

No, no vent stack at all, as it's a passive house, so adding one would have created a big thermal bridge.  Instead we have an internal air admittance valve on top of the internal soil pipe stack, that opens and draws a tiny amount of air in from the loft space if there is ever a partial vacuum in the pipes cause by a toilet flushing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, readiescards said:

At the time of installation I was planning to live off-grid hence zero electric consumption was very important

 

Winter-time off-grid electricity costs around £30/watt, maybe a bit more. IIRC, the Biopure uses 50 W even if you get the non-low-energy version and run it all the time so that's something like £1500 to £2000 extra. I'd rather spend that extra money on more PV than on a passive treatment plant as it'll give me spare power for the other ¾ of the year.

 

1 hour ago, JSHarris said:

No, no vent stack at all, as it's a passive house, so adding one would have created a big thermal bridge.  Instead we have an internal air admittance valve on top of the internal soil pipe stack, that opens and draws a tiny amount of air in from the loft space if there is ever a partial vacuum in the pipes cause by a toilet flushing. 

 

That's what I'm planning, too: Biopure, AAV in loft, only vent on the treatment plant. Useful to know it works OK. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, JSHarris said:

 

 

No, no vent stack at all, as it's a passive house, so adding one would have created a big thermal bridge.  Instead we have an internal air admittance valve on top of the internal soil pipe stack, that opens and draws a tiny amount of air in from the loft space if there is ever a partial vacuum in the pipes cause by a toilet flushing.

 

That sounds ideal for my airtight low energy renovation. But my architect says I need a vent stack pipe at roof level on the longest run (of foul drain pipe) plus AAV in every room connected. Could that be wrong? He doesn't know the regs 100% and the foul drainage has not been passed by BC yet as the warrant (Scotland) passed is for a waterless closet (now abandoned).

 

Is your loft AAV positioned outside the thermal envelope? Do you also have AAV in every room connected?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hastings said:

 

That sounds ideal for my airtight low energy renovation. But my architect says I need a vent stack pipe at roof level on the longest run (of foul drain pipe) plus AAV in every room connected. Could that be wrong? He doesn't know the regs 100% and the foul drainage has not been passed by BC yet as the warrant (Scotland) passed is for a waterless closet (now abandoned).

 

Is your loft AAV positioned outside the thermal envelope? Do you also have AAV in every room connected?

 

 

Your architect is wrong, I'm afraid.

 

I double checked this with building control and have it in writing that in order to comply with the building regs all that is needed is a form of external vent to the foul drain (just one) plus a means of allowing air into any vertical soil drain stack via an air admittance valve, or valves, if there is more than one soil pipe stack in the house).

 

We have a single vertical soil pipe stack inside the house, and this extends up into the eaves space and is fitted with a 110mm air admittance valve at the top, inside the heated envelope of the house.  This is the drawing I sent to building control in order to get approval for this:

 

Elevation - Section showing foul drain stack - A4.pdf

 

Building control agreed with me that the treatment plant vent was an adequate means of ventilating the whole foul drain run to atmosphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have just one toilet, on ground floor in lean-to extension. No basins etc upstairs.

So if treatment plant has a vent on it then just one AAV in the WC/shower room ground floor is all I need? No need for any "roof level..." or in-loft vent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This vent stack thing does seem very open to interpretation by building control.

 

I argued that the drain run was vented at the far end by a vent stack on the static caravan so we did not need one on the house and a AAV was all we needed.  Our BC inspector argued that someone might remove that later and we had to have a vent stack on the house.

 

He would have accepted just a vent pipe going up the end of the house and joining into the drain beyond the house, and then AAV's in the house, but by that point I had concreted the car parking area so had missed the chance to bury a pipe for that, so I did end up fitting a vent stack out of the top of the roof.  I can't say I notice it being particularly cold to touch, but I will insulate around it before boxing it in.,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hastings said:

I have just one toilet, on ground floor in lean-to extension. No basins etc upstairs.

So if treatment plant has a vent on it then just one AAV in the WC/shower room ground floor is all I need? No need for any "roof level..." or in-loft vent?

correct--just extend the pipe so its well above w/c pipe  connection  if you can 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/01/2019 at 09:24, Ed Davies said:

so adding one would have created a big thermal bridge.

 

Not so, the stack could be joined into the underground pipe outside the thermal envelope then AAVs inside. This is what I did but our vent is on the detached garage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, it was @JSHarris that said that; I just quoted him but I might have said something similar. In my case I want to avoid a vent stack by the house as I don't want one inside for thermal bridging reasons and to avoid roof penetrations and there's no vertical wall nearby to put an outside one on. Nearest vertical walls would nearly double the length underground pipework which seems silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...