Jump to content

Fibolite Blocks


MortarThePoint

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking of swapping to Fibolite blocks. When I first heard of them they sounded a bit 'high tech' for my reasonably traditional approach to the superstructure. I was also wary of cracking concerns having heard of it associated with other thermally performant blocks. Whilst Fibolite blocks help with U-values, the absolute requirement in my mind for the blocks to perform their structural role and I'm not wanting to make any sacrifices there. I'm sure like all self builders, I want my house to still be standing in a couple of century's time ?.

 

What do people think, does anyone have anything to say against Fibolite blocks?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you trying to achieve..? They are only an AAC block using clay bead not fly ash or shale or something similar. AAC blocks are much of a muchness - 7N or 10N are fine, 3.6N for non load bearing walls, all the manufacturers are pretty much the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PeterW said:

What are you trying to achieve..? They are only an AAC block using clay bead not fly ash or shale or something similar. AAC blocks are much of a muchness - 7N or 10N are fine, 3.6N for non load bearing walls, all the manufacturers are pretty much the same. 

 

Are you sure they count as an AAC block? They aren't foamed concrete, but are an aggregate block. The aggregate is foamed/aerated though:

    "Expanded clay nodules are produced by sophisticated pyrogenic technology whereby geochemically specific clay is expanded in a rotary kiln at high temperature."

but it claims to be "Class 1 aggregate as defined in BS 5628 -3"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - they are clay beads cement bonded

 

 

Ultra-lightweight and lightweight blocks are manufactured from cement together with one of a variety of natural or man-made expanded aggregates including: granulated/foamed blast-furnace slag, expanded clay or shale, furnace bottom ash (FBA) and fly ash (FA). The density of the aggregate is generally proportional to the strength of the block.

 


 https://www.modernmasonry.co.uk/mma/Resources/Aggregate-Blocks.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can anyone recommend a good alternative for 10.4N blocks as Fibolites only go up to 7.3N? Aglite Ultima also made by Plasmor aren't as good thermally and they can have some odd constituents that I wouldn't want in the living space.

 

Fibolite   7.3N   k=0.28W/mK

Aglite (special order)   10.4N   k=0.36W/mK

Stranlite   10.4N   k=0.43W/mK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PeterW said:

What are you building that needs 10.4N blocks..?

 

3.6N are good to 3 storey, 10's are used for significant point loading or high stress situations

 

Specified by the Structural Engineer as we have some long runs without perpendicular walls or bracing and concrete first floor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3.7N fibolites are the default choice for inner block walls in my part of the world. I would classify them as belonging to the light end of medium weight blocks at 8.9Kg per block from memory. When I enquired about ordering 7N Fibolites my BM said that would be a special order though I did notice packs of blue-stripe 7N fibolites onsite at an upmarket millionaire type private build in Boston the other day.

 

Fibolites are quite distinct from the typical light weight blocks which have the consistency of a Cadburys whisper bar. My brickie likes them because when laying courses above chest height he can lower an 8.9 kg  block onto a bed of mortar with one hand, that said my simple masonry property does not have the engineering challenges that you mention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, epsilonGreedy said:

 

Can metal mesh roll laid on mortar beds provide an alternative reinforcement against wind pressure on large masonry panels?

 

No - the point of a windpost is it resists buckling and transfers the load to the floor structure. Most houses don't need them as there are perpendicular walls (don't need to be load bearing) that do the job anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm ordering the blocks (ouch) and made a decision I thought I'd gauge people's thoughts on [over-analysing hat on again]. I decided to stick with a single 7.3N block type, rather than using 7.3N Fibolite for the inner leaf of exterior walls and 7.3N Stranlite for the load bearing partitions. So Fibolites for both wall types. I saw the pros and cons as:

 

Pro's to using Fibolite internally:
  • single block type for brickies
  • order simplicity
Con's
  • cost (51.4m2 @ £1.52/m2 difference --> £78.18)
  • acoustics?
  • lower thermal mass (950 vs 1350)

Bit worried about the acoustic side of it. Does anyone have any experience of how well Fibolite blocks damp sound?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fibolites seem to have 3dB less attenuation than Stranlites. I think that means the transmitted sound energy is double in the case of Fibolite. I don't know what a stud wall looks like in terms of sound attenuation though for comparison.

 

Fibolite 100mm (850 kg/m3) :

image.png.a1b145593322e7620fb9921168a30995.png

https://www.plasmor.co.uk/uploads/files/Technical_Library/Technical_Data_&_Reports/Acoustic Test Certificates/100mm_Fibolite_-_Plastered.pdf

 

Stranlite 100mm (1400 kg/m3) :

image.png.76a3332c5901324a60f7e07aafac63a6.png

https://www.plasmor.co.uk/uploads/files/Technical_Library/Technical_Data_&_Reports/Acoustic Test Certificates/100mm_Stranlite_-_Plastered.pdf

 

Edited by MortarThePoint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
On 01/06/2020 at 21:59, PeterW said:

What are you trying to achieve..? They are only an AAC block using clay bead not fly ash or shale or something similar. AAC blocks are much of a muchness - 7N or 10N are fine, 3.6N for non load bearing walls, all the manufacturers are pretty much the same. 

 

Just resurrecting this... I was planning on using 3.6N Fibolite's for all walls including load bearing. From the Plasmoor web site I think this seems to be fine. Do you think otherwise? Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wagas said:

 

Just resurrecting this... I was planning on using 3.6N Fibolite's for all walls including load bearing. From the Plasmoor web site I think this seems to be fine. Do you think otherwise? Thanks

 

3.6N feels a bit on the low side to me for load bearing. Has the Structural Engineer specified 3.6N? There may not be much of a price difference between 7.3N and 3.6N. There was a point in time when I had 4 types of 100mm block on site (7.3N Stranlite, 7.3N Stranlite paint grade, 7.3N Fibolite, and 10.4N Stranlite). I wouldn't do it again that way. Structural Engineer hadn't called for anything more than 7.3N for 100mm blocks so wasn't critical.

Edited by MortarThePoint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Critical Path said:

Wagas - Had same quandary myself, ended up with Plasmore Stranlte 7 Newton. light enough and barley affected u value, 

currently paying 73 p. each. in Manchester. 

 

That's a great price. I was paying £1.153 each in June last year down near Cambridge. As soon as I had a quote from one BM, the job was known and I got the same price form others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

For reference, I have had some cracking of blocks under 1.8m wide windows (near middle of window). Hopefully this is just shrinkage, but I thought I would share it on this thread as it was one of the Fibolite considerations. I suspect if we had used a layer of bed joint reinforcement in the bed just under the window this wouldn't have happened, but ultimately the shrinkage has to be accommodated somewhere and arguably under a window is the best place (?). This photo shows the worst of it (so far, but 6 months after being laid).

1621237927590_sm.thumb.jpg.4964d0e1a822d8037054e6fb084a9868.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MortarThePoint said:

For reference, I have had some cracking of blocks under 1.8m wide windows (near middle of window). Hopefully this is just shrinkage

 

 

Is this on the first floor above wooden joists embedded within the blockwork??

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...