Jump to content

Temporary heat source for UFH: Willis heaters


oranjeboom

22388 views

After various delays, the time has come to get some heat into the house, and as there have been a few on BH that have gone down the route of Willis, thought I would give it a go as well. Hopefully others will find the blog entry also.

 

Background:

  • Renovated (3G passiv-rated windows, 120mm EPS EWI, 400mm loft insul, MVHR - not tested air leakiness yet) / extended (175mm SIPs) south facing detached house, East Kent
  • 156sqm of wet UFH in 100mm concrete (with circa 300-375mm EPS insulation)
  • 130L in UFH
  • Wunda 12 port manifold (The heating valve on the manifold operates in the range of 30-70oC)
  • Wunda wired room thermostats for each room (but probably won't use for this temporary setup now)
  • 12Kw eDual for DHW (not to be included as part of Willis setup)
  • 12Kw Sunamp for DHW/UFH (not to be included as part of Willis setup)
  • 3.8Kw PV (potentially have further DIY grid implemented later on)

 

Not looking to cater for worst case low temps as at these times will just plug in some extra heaters:

 

image.thumb.png.295847607acdac4392e32785661847d1.png

 

 

image.thumb.png.c4678aa7fe5231b1bb4fc06732888055.png

 

I originally ordered 2x 12Kw heat batteries for DHW and UFH. Total reliance on the PV in summer and then off-peak grid in the winter. An all electric approach initially without ASHP. Not keen to spend £8-10k on an MCS installed heat pump to get back an estimated / possible £8-10k. Installers seem very vague on the RHI returns and if I have read correctly, I will have to be metered in order to qualify in any case (as have not lived in the property previously). Since the house will be far above buildreg stds (but below PH level), I simply won't be using the amount of expected input that the installers calculate - hence I won't be getting back the cost of the ASHP supply and fit install. So most likely won't go down the MCS route, and if I were to install an ASHP, it would be a cheapy from fleabay.

 

Having excluded using an ASHP, I learnt that Sunamp were testing various units late 2019. But typically with Sunamp, after continued confusion on their part as to what ASHPs they may have tested/not tested/will be testing soon, I've made the decision that I can't want any longer on their input. So for now I will leave the ASHP option until later on and perhaps consider a propane unit (e.g. Vaillant ) when they come online on a non-RHI basis if I can get a decent install cost.

 

 

 

Willis Heater approach

So therefore looking to heat the UFH with 2x 3Kw willis heaters in order to progress with the internal house work. Thought I'd add some info on here as a lot of people like myself aren't familiar what they are. They originated out of Ireland and still much in use over there. They're essentially external immersion coils and instead of sitting inside a tank are simple external electric units - AKA "Willis jacket", "standard sleeved immersion heater"," inline electric heater". Googling should get you something like this:

Willis Immersion Heater | Shell & 3kW Element

 

Item Weight 1.15 Kg
Product Dimensions

30 x 9 x 9 cm

 

I have tried to get plumbers interested in rigging this up, but they're either not interested or have told me it's not possible/don;t know what a willis heater is. I've managed to plumb in all the Hep2o in the house, so hopefully this won't be too much of a bodge.

 

@TerryE has kindly discussed his set up which is pretty impressive with his DS18B20s set into the walls etc. I'm no programmer and my javscript is mainly simple web stuff and wanting to get heat into the place ASAP, I just want a KISS approach for now. Perhaps later I will think about having some of it programmed using Terry's Node Red option which makes for interesting possibilities. Get a feel for Terry's approach here: 

 

But as I've said, I'm after a bog standard dummies approach to this - seriously KISS:

 

So rather than wiring up room thermostats to the wiring centre, I will for now simply use the Willis inbuilt thermostat and set that to gradual increasing temps from 10oC up to a max of 25oC. A gradual heat increase seems safer in my mind. My only concern is if the Willis thermostat fails and carries on beyond 25oC - up to max temp. Obviously I will have the manifold mixing/blending valve that should restrict temp flow into the UFH also, but is there a further failsafe to consider?

 

Dummies layout.

Eventual Sunamp units (for DHW) will be located on left of manifold so having to locate Willis heaters to right  and expansion vessel top right:

 

1909803810_willissetup2.JPG.ac25b07edcc1b69892d4d33a3c4e984b.JPG

FYI: The immersions need to be turned the other way (so colder water enters the side)

 

Parts list:

  • 15mm copper pipe. The Willis heaters are 15mm so I presume plumbing them into the manifold with 15mm would be okay?
  • 15mm plastic pipe for cold return should suffice I presume?
  • Bottle vents - automatically release any trapped air (like this one). Do I need any and if so where do I place them?
  • Willis heater (ebay has the cheapest)
  • Expansion vessel - 8litres sufficient for total UFH volume of 130L? (like this one
  • 20A DP switch outlet (for each willis) from a 16A MCB (like this one)  . Probably one for each willis
  • Immersion timer (like this one) to be added possibly when I change over to E7 low tarriff rates

 

Will get an electrician to wire it all in for me!

 

Be grateful for comments, suggestions and any answers to above questions!

 

 

FYI: I'm no way the first person to install a Willis, so here's a list of other users on BH that have gone the Willis way and will know more than I do:

 

@dpmiller: photo / details here

@TerryE

@vivienz

@CC45

@chrisb here

@Gav_P - here (Any pics?)

 

Willis instructions:

 

schematic

 

20200117_104153.thumb.jpg.1021a23b20f869bf8516fe2b44605ab9.jpg

 

 

 

 

  • Like 5

159 Comments


Recommended Comments



10 minutes ago, Jeremy Harris said:

Yes, with a pump that probably works just fine.  They were originally designed to just thermosyphon, as shown in the top diagram in the first post in the thread

Which is where rethinking was introduced. Huge differences in flow rates / turbulence inside the heater body. 
No decades of feedback in honesty, but two seasons heating a 300m2 build with the stats set to ~40oC without even a single sniff of bother is evidence enough to ‘argue’ the toss afaic.

Discussing this now with my electrician, over a pint or 3, and even he said it’s counter-intuitive to have the electrified head under the heater. I’ve seen enough immersions leaking through the seals to be cautious. Over cautious maybe, but I’ve deliberated and forged ahead from my own findings. 
So far, so good. 

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

Which is where rethinking was introduced. Huge differences in flow rates / turbulence inside the heater body. 
No decades of feedback in honesty, but two seasons heating a 300m2 build with the stats set to ~40oC without even a single sniff of bother is evidence enough to ‘argue’ the toss afaic.

Discussing this now with my electrician, over a pint or 3, and even he said it’s counter-intuitive to have the electrified head under the heater. I’ve seen enough immersions leaking through the seals to be cautious. Over cautious maybe, but I’ve deliberated and forged ahead from my own findings. 
So far, so good. 

 

 

Frankly I'd not risk it, Nick.  Much, much easier to just plumb the things the right way up and have done with it.  They work fine like that, have been for decades without any issues.  It's no more risky for the electrical connections than an immersion fitted in the bottom of an insulated tank, anyway, probably less so, as any leaks are likely to bypass the electrics and run down the outside.  These things have been running the right way up all over NI without causing any problems with the electrics.

 

I just can't see any good reason for wanting to fit the thing upside down.

Link to comment

also worth noting that some (ours anyway) are a soldered-up sealed unit so not much chance of a leak. Oh and the fitting at the top is a standard one so the pipe won't slide on in...

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Jeremy Harris said:

 

 

Frankly I'd not risk it, Nick.  Much, much easier to just plumb the things the right way up and have done with it.  They work fine like that, have been for decades without any issues.  It's no more risky for the electrical connections than an immersion fitted in the bottom of an insulated tank, anyway, probably less so, as any leaks are likely to bypass the electrics and run down the outside.  These things have been running the right way up all over NI without causing any problems with the electrics.

 

I just can't see any good reason for wanting to fit the thing upside down.

Thanks Jeremy. The review board will reside over this today :)  

 

53 minutes ago, dpmiller said:

also worth noting that some (ours anyway) are a soldered-up sealed unit so not much chance of a leak. Oh and the fitting at the top is a standard one so the pipe won't slide on in...

Which supplier did you use? The one I used, not only were there no MI’s but the pipe does indeed slide all the way in and hit the element. Had to mark depth on the pipes to check they’re well clear as that would be disastrous for the element of a DIY warrior were to assume the element was a depth stop. :/ 

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

Which supplier did you use? The one I used, not only were there no MI’s but the pipe does indeed slide all the way in and hit the element. Had to mark depth on the pipes to check they’re well clear as that would be disastrous for the element of a DIY warrior were to assume the element was a depth stop. :/ 

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Willis-Jacket-Complete-External-Immersion-Heater-Prewired-fully-assembled/202416631247?epid=1588852290&hash=item2f20f8adcf:g:wAgAAOSwfEJeHIev

 

even had MIs...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, dpmiller said:

 

That's interesting since that's who I used to get my two heaters from as well. Perhaps they have more than one supplier (the elements themselves are from Tesla). One heater allowed me to 'drop' the pipe all the way down into the cylinder and with the other it hit the element (which i had assumed was the stop depth until I realised what was going on). Anyway, something to watch out for when fitting these - if your copper starts to glow nice and red.....

Link to comment

I have a feeling that either Willis didn't patent these things, or if they did, then it's now expired, as there seems to be several different manufacturers of them.  This probably explains why there are now several different types of essentially the same thing.  Once upon a time, the only manufacturer was Willis Heating, in Belfast (https://willis-heating.com/ ), but it seems that Willis have expanded into lots of related areas and don't seem to make the Willis heaters any more.

 

I first came across them nearly 30 years ago, as they were pretty commonplace in parts of SW Scotland, as well as NI (probably because it was often quicker to get stuff from Belfast than it was from Ayr or Dumfries, at least for those out where we used to live).  Not often fitted to new builds, but they seemed a pretty common fit  to houses that had things like back burners providing hot water.  The second house we bought when living there had a Baxi stove for hot water, with a Willis heater fitted alongside the cylinder.  Seemed to work very well, really handy for heating a bit of hot water very quickly if the stove was out. 

 

You can now get versions with a 1 kW immersion, and I have wondered whether one of those, fitted with a thermostat set for around 45°C and plumbed in to the hot feed under the basin might not make for a handy way to get instant hot water for hand washing.  They hold around 4 litres, more than enough for a quick hand wash.

 

Found this close up of the labels on a Willis (actually an Emerald Geyser version) that shows clearly the direction of flow and has a sensible warning that the whole thing has to be filled with water:

 

516113083_Willis-closeupshowinglabels.thumb.jpg.04dc9e96ae6a9924bdc68f2a17e95830.jpg

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Surely mounted on its side would lead to a bigger air pocket inside??? I notice that one above must be fitted to a vented system only?

Link to comment

Yes, it's odd that that Emerald Geyser label sort-of implies that it should be mounted horizontally with the “side” connection downwards (assuming writing upwards). I'd think if you wanted to put one on its side, which seems sensible to me from the point of view of avoiding an air pocket but not having electrics under water, you'd put that connection on the top.

 

I also wonder why they say “vented system only”. Do they really mean max pressure 1.5 bar or something like that?

Link to comment

round these parts, upright mounting would be a given. But if on its side then side connection up yes.

 

 

Link to comment
16 hours ago, joe90 said:

Surely mounted on its side would lead to a bigger air pocket inside??? I notice that one above must be fitted to a vented system only?

 

14 hours ago, Ed Davies said:

Yes, it's odd that that Emerald Geyser label sort-of implies that it should be mounted horizontally with the “side” connection downwards (assuming writing upwards). I'd think if you wanted to put one on its side, which seems sensible to me from the point of view of avoiding an air pocket but not having electrics under water, you'd put that connection on the top.

 

I also wonder why they say “vented system only”. Do they really mean max pressure 1.5 bar or something like that?

 

 

If I turn the photo the right way up, so it shows it in the mounted position, does that help?

 

1607589968_Willis-closeupshowinglabels.thumb.jpg.aec5afab520af074917277925d8eaabc.jpg

Link to comment

Isn't the idea to not get any air trapped because air is compressible.  This can store more energy than the equivalent volume of liquid.  It is why pressure vessels are tested with oil and not gas.  If they do fail, then only a little oil comes out.

We used to fit this sort of heaters to spa baths back in the 1980s.  I can't remember one failing.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Jeremy Harris said:

If I turn the photo the right way up, so it shows it in the mounted position, does that help?

 

So why did they put the writing on sideways? If you wanted to give people a big hint as to which way round it has to go you'd orientate the writing to match unless, of course, you were a not-very-good industrial designer which is not entirely uncommon.

 

My only interest in this is that I'm thinking I might have a couple of these in the hot water system for my house (largely as PV diversion loads) which will be in the bottom corner of the A-frame on the south side of the house so will have quite a bit of volume available but not a lot of headroom. Mounting the things horizontally would help as you then don't need the extra height to be able to get the element out.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Ed Davies said:

So why did they put the writing on sideways?


Agreed, also, most things that have to be orientated correctly have “this way up (arrow)”. Has anyone seen the MI,S for these things (not that most people read the instructions ?).

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Ed Davies said:

 

So why did they put the writing on sideways? If you wanted to give people a big hint as to which way round it has to go you'd orientate the writing to match unless, of course, you were a not-very-good industrial designer which is not entirely uncommon.

 

My only interest in this is that I'm thinking I might have a couple of these in the hot water system for my house (largely as PV diversion loads) which will be in the bottom corner of the A-frame on the south side of the house so will have quite a bit of volume available but not a lot of headroom. Mounting the things horizontally would help as you then don't need the extra height to be able to get the element out.

 

 

My guess is that Emerald Geyser are just one of a handful of companies that have copied the original Willis heater.  These things were, to the best of my knowledge, only ever fitted in NI and the immediately surrounding area.  When I first came across them around 30 years ago, I'd not seen anything like it before, but one of the NI chaps at work assured me they were really common over the water, especially around the Belfast area.  Everyone there just know which way up they went, as they were in pretty common use.

 

These things were designed to be fitted alongside an existing hot water cylinder, within the confines of a hot press/airing cupboard.  The vertical mounting allowed this, as the thing can sit within the corner space pretty neatly, and just attach to the existing plumbing.

 

It's only in the last few years that people have been looking at using them for other purposes, and I have a faint suspicion that I may be partially to blame for this, as I remember mentioning them on Ebuild as a possible way to build a cheap and cheerful water heating system for UFH.  IIRC, this was around the time that @TerryE opted to fit them for just this purpose.  Before that, I'd not heard of them being used for running UFH before, although that doesn't mean that someone hadn't done it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

 

 

1 hour ago, joe90 said:


Agreed, also, most things that have to be orientated correctly have “this way up (arrow)”. Has anyone seen the MI,S for these things (not that most people read the instructions ?).

 

 

Yes, and the diagram (copied again below) I posted earlier is a direct copy of the original Willis instructions (Willis sold these as "Economisers" originally, as you can get a small volume of hot water quickly, without waiting for the whole tank to heat up).

 

1326391042_CorrectWillisinstallationdiagram.thumb.jpg.f1809572974a1695bbca7391198049c1.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Well our Willis has been heating the house for the last two years without any problems and it is mounted with the electrics at the top!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
12 minutes ago, JanetE said:

Well our Willis has been heating the house for the last two years without any problems and it is mounted with the electrics at the top!

 

 

I don't doubt that they will work for a time mounted upside down, the issue is whether the inevitable air space that this causes will lead to longer term problems.  I'm not a fan of fitting things contrary to the designer's intentions, and when Willis designed these things they were very definitely intended to be mounted as shown in that diagram, and included warnings to ensure that the case must be completely filled with water (which cannot be the case if they are mounted upside down - sooner or later there is going to be air trapped in that big space above the side pipe).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
37 minutes ago, A_L said:

 

possibly not, immersion heater elements usually have 'cold zones' at each end (usually about 50mm apparently) 

 

http://www.tpfay.co.uk/information/glossary-descriptions-heating-elements/#ColdEndDef

 

http://www.tpfay.co.uk/our-products/straight-elements/#.Xiw24IV2vIU

 

 

Yes, they do, but I bet heat will still be conducted up the cores to the air space (which may well be taller than 50mm anyway), and the manufacturer's instructions do state clearly that there should not be any air space within the thing.  That warm air space is also going to make corrosion around the brazed joins where the element and thermostat pocket are attached to the threaded part and around the exposed parts of the element themselves more likely, I suspect..

 

I just cannot see any logical reason for wanting to mount these things upside down, I'm afraid.  They have a long track record of working well for decades when mounted the right way up, yet now it seems some just want to mount them upside down because they think that the original manufacturer has got it wrong for all these years.  It's not even as if it's any harder to mount them the right way up, the work involved is exactly the same, and they don't take up any more room when mounted correctly.

Link to comment

I still think it is a safety issue.  Sometimes instructions seems counter intuitive, not following them is how nuclear power plants melt down.

Anyone willing to put an old paint pot half full of water on a stove, then compare it with a full paint pot on a stove.

See which lid flies the furthest.

Edited by SteamyTea
  • Haha 1
Link to comment

Ours didn't have the orientation diagram on it and IIRC minimal fitting instructions.  The arrows indicated water flow and there was no "this way up" orientation arrow.  

 

The gas accumulation issues are completely different for the standard in unvented cylinder installation where the Wills uses thermal circulation in a potable water environment where the water turnover might be ~1m³ / day, but in our usecase we have about 35 ltr of water in our UFH loops -- the same 35 ltr as 2½ years ago when it was first flushed and bled, so there is no further introduced gas to accumulate.  I can't see where this ~100 cm³ gas could come.

 

Whilst the inverted position might avoid a potential gas trap, IMO the device can't have been designed for this because of issues of electrical safety:  there is no appropriate IPS protection for the wiring contacts and thermal cut out so any seal failure on the element ring in the inverted position would result in electrical shorting.  TBH, I think that there are also pragmatic maintenance advantages in having the heater threaded end up, as the element is pretty much at the highest point in the circuit and being upright it could be replaced with minimal water loss if the element failed, thus simplifying refill, flushing, repressurising the system.

 

Incidentally our thermostat cutout is trimmed to ~50°C and I can't recall logging a peak temperature over ~35°C since the system was commissioned.

 

Notwithstanding this, the next time I do some maintenance to the system (possibly over the summer) I might add "cracking the coil" with a heater element key to see if it bleeds any gas to the todo list.

 

Edited by TerryE
Link to comment
16 minutes ago, TerryE said:

Whilst the inverted position might avoid a potential gas trap, IMO the device can't have been designed for this because of issues of electrical safety:  there is no appropriate IPS protection for the wiring contacts and thermal cut out so any seal failure on the element ring in the inverted position would result in electrical shorting.  TBH, I think that there are also pragmatic maintenance advantages in having the heater threaded end up, as the element is pretty much at the highest point in the circuit and being upright it could be replaced with minimal water loss if the element failed, thus simplifying refill, flushing, repressurising the system.

 

 

 

 

I can assure you that it was indeed designed to be fitted with the electrical connections at the bottom.  There must be many thousands of these in use in NI, all fitted the right way up.  The only cases I've seen of people fitting them upside down are on this forum and it's predecessor, so it seems to be something that has sprung up here.

 

We have a few members here from NI, and I'm sure they will confirm that they are always fitted the right way up over there, as shown in that diagram I posted above that is a copy of the original Willis instructions.

Link to comment

On a rainy morning with little to do I tried to find instructions fir fitting a Willis heater and all I could find was the diagram that @Jeremy Harris posted above. Also the Navitron forum talked about little information on the right way to fit them.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...