Jump to content

Temporary heat source for UFH: Willis heaters


oranjeboom

22359 views

After various delays, the time has come to get some heat into the house, and as there have been a few on BH that have gone down the route of Willis, thought I would give it a go as well. Hopefully others will find the blog entry also.

 

Background:

  • Renovated (3G passiv-rated windows, 120mm EPS EWI, 400mm loft insul, MVHR - not tested air leakiness yet) / extended (175mm SIPs) south facing detached house, East Kent
  • 156sqm of wet UFH in 100mm concrete (with circa 300-375mm EPS insulation)
  • 130L in UFH
  • Wunda 12 port manifold (The heating valve on the manifold operates in the range of 30-70oC)
  • Wunda wired room thermostats for each room (but probably won't use for this temporary setup now)
  • 12Kw eDual for DHW (not to be included as part of Willis setup)
  • 12Kw Sunamp for DHW/UFH (not to be included as part of Willis setup)
  • 3.8Kw PV (potentially have further DIY grid implemented later on)

 

Not looking to cater for worst case low temps as at these times will just plug in some extra heaters:

 

image.thumb.png.295847607acdac4392e32785661847d1.png

 

 

image.thumb.png.c4678aa7fe5231b1bb4fc06732888055.png

 

I originally ordered 2x 12Kw heat batteries for DHW and UFH. Total reliance on the PV in summer and then off-peak grid in the winter. An all electric approach initially without ASHP. Not keen to spend £8-10k on an MCS installed heat pump to get back an estimated / possible £8-10k. Installers seem very vague on the RHI returns and if I have read correctly, I will have to be metered in order to qualify in any case (as have not lived in the property previously). Since the house will be far above buildreg stds (but below PH level), I simply won't be using the amount of expected input that the installers calculate - hence I won't be getting back the cost of the ASHP supply and fit install. So most likely won't go down the MCS route, and if I were to install an ASHP, it would be a cheapy from fleabay.

 

Having excluded using an ASHP, I learnt that Sunamp were testing various units late 2019. But typically with Sunamp, after continued confusion on their part as to what ASHPs they may have tested/not tested/will be testing soon, I've made the decision that I can't want any longer on their input. So for now I will leave the ASHP option until later on and perhaps consider a propane unit (e.g. Vaillant ) when they come online on a non-RHI basis if I can get a decent install cost.

 

 

 

Willis Heater approach

So therefore looking to heat the UFH with 2x 3Kw willis heaters in order to progress with the internal house work. Thought I'd add some info on here as a lot of people like myself aren't familiar what they are. They originated out of Ireland and still much in use over there. They're essentially external immersion coils and instead of sitting inside a tank are simple external electric units - AKA "Willis jacket", "standard sleeved immersion heater"," inline electric heater". Googling should get you something like this:

Willis Immersion Heater | Shell & 3kW Element

 

Item Weight 1.15 Kg
Product Dimensions

30 x 9 x 9 cm

 

I have tried to get plumbers interested in rigging this up, but they're either not interested or have told me it's not possible/don;t know what a willis heater is. I've managed to plumb in all the Hep2o in the house, so hopefully this won't be too much of a bodge.

 

@TerryE has kindly discussed his set up which is pretty impressive with his DS18B20s set into the walls etc. I'm no programmer and my javscript is mainly simple web stuff and wanting to get heat into the place ASAP, I just want a KISS approach for now. Perhaps later I will think about having some of it programmed using Terry's Node Red option which makes for interesting possibilities. Get a feel for Terry's approach here: 

 

But as I've said, I'm after a bog standard dummies approach to this - seriously KISS:

 

So rather than wiring up room thermostats to the wiring centre, I will for now simply use the Willis inbuilt thermostat and set that to gradual increasing temps from 10oC up to a max of 25oC. A gradual heat increase seems safer in my mind. My only concern is if the Willis thermostat fails and carries on beyond 25oC - up to max temp. Obviously I will have the manifold mixing/blending valve that should restrict temp flow into the UFH also, but is there a further failsafe to consider?

 

Dummies layout.

Eventual Sunamp units (for DHW) will be located on left of manifold so having to locate Willis heaters to right  and expansion vessel top right:

 

1909803810_willissetup2.JPG.ac25b07edcc1b69892d4d33a3c4e984b.JPG

FYI: The immersions need to be turned the other way (so colder water enters the side)

 

Parts list:

  • 15mm copper pipe. The Willis heaters are 15mm so I presume plumbing them into the manifold with 15mm would be okay?
  • 15mm plastic pipe for cold return should suffice I presume?
  • Bottle vents - automatically release any trapped air (like this one). Do I need any and if so where do I place them?
  • Willis heater (ebay has the cheapest)
  • Expansion vessel - 8litres sufficient for total UFH volume of 130L? (like this one
  • 20A DP switch outlet (for each willis) from a 16A MCB (like this one)  . Probably one for each willis
  • Immersion timer (like this one) to be added possibly when I change over to E7 low tarriff rates

 

Will get an electrician to wire it all in for me!

 

Be grateful for comments, suggestions and any answers to above questions!

 

 

FYI: I'm no way the first person to install a Willis, so here's a list of other users on BH that have gone the Willis way and will know more than I do:

 

@dpmiller: photo / details here

@TerryE

@vivienz

@CC45

@chrisb here

@Gav_P - here (Any pics?)

 

Willis instructions:

 

schematic

 

20200117_104153.thumb.jpg.1021a23b20f869bf8516fe2b44605ab9.jpg

 

 

 

 

  • Like 5

159 Comments


Recommended Comments



I only run mine at 1 bar, but the PRV is still 3 bar  Everything will take 3 bar, so is that wrong?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
16 hours ago, PeterW said:

Thanks! Not sure why I didn't find any earlier as there are a few on ebay (dubious quality perhaps, but bought an Italian-made one). Guess there's not enough demand to buy them from TS/SF.

 

Next question - is there a max distance I can have the expansion vessel from the return leg? I'd like to have it out of the way (yet serviceable). Probably 4m from the return leg (where it splits off by the willis pumps).

 

Link to comment

Sat in my hand at the moment I have a brand new 1.5 bar PRV, but it's a 3/4" one, sent to me in error after I'd ordered a 1/2" one.  Yours for the cost of postage if it's any use (been sat on the shelf above my desk as I haven't had the heart to throw it away...).

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Jeremy Harris said:

Sat in my hand at the moment I have a brand new 1.5 bar PRV, but it's a 3/4" one, sent to me in error after I'd ordered a 1/2" one.  Yours for the cost of postage if it's any use (been sat on the shelf above my desk as I haven't had the heart to throw it away...).

 

Thanks for the offer Jeremy, but I only ordered one 30mins before you'd posted this!! Another item for the MarketPlace?

 

 

More questions:

 

Next question - I've placed the expansion vessel about 3.2m from the return leg where it splits off by the willis heaters (out of the way, yet serviceable). I couldn't find any recommended distances, so presume this distance is okay?

 

22mm plastic (Hep2o) - found some spare, so was going to use this between the manifold and the willis heaters (which are 15mm):

 

MANIFOLD (1")   -->   22MM PLASTIC -->  15MM WILLIS ----> 22MM PLASTIC -->  MANIFOLD (1") 

 

image.png.9c499deaa6efa4f143f3b5949333a24f.png

 

Any issues with flow rates? 

 

I'll have some copper on the inlet/outlet sides also.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by oranjeboom
Link to comment

The Willises should really be vertical.  I personally did and would prefer to do the 22mm to/from the manifolds in copper. 

 

3.2m is fine so long as it is unimpeded

Link to comment
6 hours ago, TerryE said:

The Willises should really be vertical.

Yes, was seeing whether it could be done on their side as was hoping to use space in the already limited cupboard for other items. But will have them assembled vertically then.  Just had the postman deliver them this morning and the instructions imply the same. Will post them up in the blog for others.

 

6 hours ago, TerryE said:

would prefer to do the 22mm to/from the manifolds in copper. 

 

Yes, if this was a permanent heating source, then I would have it in copper too. But most likely now will probably adopt a cheap ASHP in the summer so I only really seeing this being in use until April. It will need to have a few bends in there also, so plastic would help. Would save a bit of time too.

 

Any major issues with part 15mm copper part 22mm plastic then?

 

6 hours ago, TerryE said:

3.2m is fine so long as it is unimpeded

 

Just a couple of bends.

 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, oranjeboom said:

Any major issues with part 15mm copper part 22mm plastic then?


Nope, crack on 

Link to comment

Cracking on and just loose fitted most bits now, but with the manifold being slightly lower than the top of the willis heaters I could get air trapped in the top pipework (above the heaters). So was thinking to add an automatic air vent like so. Would the experts on here concur?

 

TIA !

Link to comment

Why two heaters? Half the cost if you only use one!?

 

Has anyone looked at the life cycle cost of operating the Willis Heater compared to purchasing and operating an Air Source Heat Pump? I was thinking I'm 62 years old, how many years could I run the Willis heater before I reach the point where it would have been more sensible to buy a ASHP and all the associated kit.

Link to comment

My heat loss figures are greater than most on here, so figured out I would need 2 heaters. They're likely only going to be short-term (but have now plumbed them in with a long-term backup solution) with the view that I will be using an ASHP for my UFH if I can source a cheap (possibly non-MCS installed) one. But it'll be interesting to see how the house performs when I start heating it. Suspect too costly and ASHP will be favoured.

 

So as with most things @Triassic, it would depend on your heat loss figures and setup. You could run them during E7 hrs so that you have heat in the slab in the morning and depending what heat loss you have, that could last a while b4 heat is called for again.

Link to comment

I might just follow your lead and fit a Willis heater in the short term, so as to get some heat into the house. 
 

I’m at first fix stage, so plan to put the pipework and electrics in place for an ASHP.  I’ll fit a non-MSC ASHP, if I can source one at the right price. As with many self builds, money is tight, so let me know if you spot any ASHP bargains! 

Link to comment

11B6BC85-DFCE-4BE9-BAC7-DE60C6138B2A.thumb.jpeg.2a745da5ef947c5e765cee10da9c3f2a.jpeg

 

This is how we set up temporary Willis heaters. 
The 22mm into 22mm tees with 22x15mm reducing sets giving 15mm copper tails to connect the heaters off. 
The 22mm is a constant recirculating loop, with a pump, so the heaters don’t boil or short cycle like crazy. 
At the bottom is the 22mm ‘return’ which was connected to the manifold return and then the top right 22mm after the pump had another tee which becomes flow to the manifold. 
Don’t connect them directly to the manifold as the flow will be proportional and cause headaches. 
Works a treat and we have 2 jobs running on these at the moment, toasty warm. 

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

The 22mm is a constant recirculating loop, with a pump, so the heaters don’t boil or short cycle like crazy. 

Your Hand was in the way! Couldn't see the loop.

 

Where are feed and return?

 

1 - 2 -3 - 4 On

4 -3 - 2 -1 Off      KISS!

Edited by Triassic
Link to comment

I notice you are all just putting the willis heaters on a switch.

 

No attempt to interlock this with ensuring the pump is on and water is flowing?

 

The "engineer" in me says contactor controlled by call for heat from manifold controller which in turn is controlled by the room thermostats.

 

Or are you just relying on the immersion thermostat to turn off if the water stops flowing?

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, ProDave said:

I notice you are all just putting the willis heaters on a switch.

 

No attempt to interlock this with ensuring the pump is on and water is flowing?

 

The "engineer" in me says contactor controlled by call for heat from manifold controller which in turn is controlled by the room thermostats.

 

Or are you just relying on the immersion thermostat to turn off if the water stops flowing?

Yup and yup. 
On our permanent installs they’re exactly as you say. Contractor fed so cannot be run dry. ;)  

On the temp setups I’m happy to just explain the 1,2,3,4 process. 

1 hour ago, Triassic said:

Your Hand was in the way! Couldn't see the loop.

 

Where are feed and return?

 

1 - 2 -3 - 4 On

4 -3 - 2 -1 Off      KISS!

Off = 1,2,3,4 

eg turn the heaters off before shutting down the pumps and vice versa. 
KISS at its finest.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Nickfromwales said:

11B6BC85-DFCE-4BE9-BAC7-DE60C6138B2A.thumb.jpeg.2a745da5ef947c5e765cee10da9c3f2a.jpeg

 

This is how we set up temporary Willis heaters. 
The 22mm into 22mm tees with 22x15mm reducing sets giving 15mm copper tails to connect the heaters off. 
The 22mm is a constant recirculating loop, with a pump, so the heaters don’t boil or short cycle like crazy. 
At the bottom is the 22mm ‘return’ which was connected to the manifold return and then the top right 22mm after the pump had another tee which becomes flow to the manifold. 
Don’t connect them directly to the manifold as the flow will be proportional and cause headaches. 
Works a treat and we have 2 jobs running on these at the moment, toasty warm. 

 

 

Those Willis heaters are mounted upside down!

 

They are supposed to be mounted with the heating element cap at the bottom, so there's no air pocket trapped adjacent to the heating element bit above the side branch.

 

This diagram (randomly nicked from the web) shows how they are supposed to be installed:

 

image.png.51e44a05c0714322b2e446fcef1627d7.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Looks neat as always @Nickfromwales !!

 

1 hour ago, Jeremy Harris said:

 

Those Willis heaters are mounted upside down!

Yes, that's what the instructions (posted above in blog) seem to state also. But perhaps Nick's setup won't have any air in his plumbing at all! ?

 

My setup so far means I am relying on the manifold pump to circulate the water through the heaters too. They're only a short distance from the manifold on the adjacent wall:

20200123_164645.thumb.jpg.64e1a85a2fb6c3c8d2cf4571ea477301.jpg

 

Still need to figure out how to connect the pipework to manifold. Was even thinking of using 19mm bore flexi connectors as this is just a short term solution after all. 

Not shown, but will have a 15mm pipe going up (see spare 22x22x15 on return flow) to the expansion vessel.

 

Still loose fitted by the way so hence the dropped pipework in places!

 

20200123_164600.thumb.jpg.012e7f11e93894dbcdd59d2dae278685.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I think this photo:

 

Upside down Willis.jpg

 

is either the second or third Willis setup I've seen with the things mounted upside down.  Your set up, @oranjeboom is spot on, and is exactly how they are supposed to be fitted.

 

Fitting them upside down leaves an air pocket in the section above the side (supposed to be the inlet) pipe, which then means that part of the heating element will be running in air, which is not desirable in terms of prolonging the life of the immersion element.

Link to comment

After purging these out  I've seen no argument strong enough to make me put these in the other way around TBH. The prospect of a leak getting down into the electrics is far more of a factor for me than a few mm of air sitting at the head of the heater jacket. The thermostats push in too, so want to drop down / out when the other way around. With faultless operation to date to reflect upon, over multiple instances, I remain sufficiently happy that water leaking down onto electrics vs the air pocket 'issue' ( yet to be shown how much of a real world issue that actually would ever be !?! ) is argument enough for little 'ol me to carry on on my own judgement. I could be convinced to put them horizontally maybe, so I'll reflect and see if there's sufficient merit to do so.

I did look at google images of other installations and decided upon what I thought was the lesser of the two evils.

Link to comment
37 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

After purging these out  I've seen no argument strong enough to make me put these in the other way around TBH. The prospect of a leak getting down into the electrics is far more of a factor for me than a few mm of air sitting at the head of the heater jacket. The thermostats push in too, so want to drop down / out when the other way around. With faultless operation to date to reflect upon, over multiple instances, I remain sufficiently happy that water leaking down onto electrics vs the air pocket 'issue' ( yet to be shown how much of a real world issue that actually would ever be !?! ) is argument enough for little 'ol me to carry on on my own judgement. I could be convinced to put them horizontally maybe, so I'll reflect and see if there's sufficient merit to do so.

I did look at google images of other installations and decided upon what I thought was the lesser of the two evils.

 

+'s and -'s for the positioning.

 

I always seem to have plenty of air in my plumbing so wanted to avoid that air pocket at the top.

 

I did also notice that when having the willis 'the right way up' is that copper pipe will slide very nice into the heater at the top....and way down into the chamber itself touching the actual heating element inside. Probably not what you want! Also possible to drop and lose your copper pipe in the chamber - bit of a pig if you've just plumbed in the return pipes at the bottom. Perhaps other willis-type heaters have some sort of retainer to prevent you from over-insertion of the pipes!

 

38 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

I did look at google images of other installations and decided upon what I thought was the lesser of the two evils.

 

Reminds me of searching for 'willis heaters' on ebay...don't think it quite understood what kind of heater I was in need of...

 

Edited by oranjeboom
Link to comment

Doesn't "On the side, with the side pipe upwards"  solve all the arguments?  No air pockets, thermostat won't drop out, a leak won't soak the electrics.  What is wrong with that?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, ProDave said:

Doesn't "On the side, with the side pipe upwards"  solve all the arguments?  No air pockets, thermostat won't drop out, a leak won't soak the electrics.  What is wrong with that?

Nothing, upon review. ?
Im still unconvinced there is any real detriment, unless someone has an instance to recall, to them being as I fitted them. Probably / maybe isn’t argument enough when I see them in and working and if they were airlocked at the top you’d be able to hear it. The ones I have in currently are running perfectly well and silently ( bar the noise of the adjacent pump ).

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Nickfromwales said:

After purging these out  I've seen no argument strong enough to make me put these in the other way around TBH. The prospect of a leak getting down into the electrics is far more of a factor for me than a few mm of air sitting at the head of the heater jacket. The thermostats push in too, so want to drop down / out when the other way around. With faultless operation to date to reflect upon, over multiple instances, I remain sufficiently happy that water leaking down onto electrics vs the air pocket 'issue' ( yet to be shown how much of a real world issue that actually would ever be !?! ) is argument enough for little 'ol me to carry on on my own judgement. I could be convinced to put them horizontally maybe, so I'll reflect and see if there's sufficient merit to do so.

I did look at google images of other installations and decided upon what I thought was the lesser of the two evils.

 

 

Except that mounting them upside down is the opposite of the way they were designed and intended to be used, and air/gas is always going to collect in that space, no matter how much you faff around trying to bleed air out around the immersion threads. 

 

I'm not a fan of fitting things in the opposite orientation to the designer intended, and in the opposite orientation to all the many of these things in use across NI.  Far better to just stick to the original MIs, IMHO.

 

 How many years experience do you have of mounting them upside down and still being reliable?  Willis has decades of experience of them being reliable when mounted in accordance with their original design.

 

 

1 hour ago, ProDave said:

Doesn't "On the side, with the side pipe upwards"  solve all the arguments?  No air pockets, thermostat won't drop out, a leak won't soak the electrics.  What is wrong with that?

 

Yes, with a pump that probably works just fine.  They were originally designed to just thermosyphon, as shown in the top diagram in the first post in the thread specific to this issue, but if pumped should work OK sideways, with the bottom port facing upwards. 

 

I still think it's better to mount them as Willis intended, though, as they've got a pretty good track record for working very well when mounted as designed.

 

8 minutes ago, Nickfromwales said:

Nothing, upon review. ?
Im still unconvinced there is any real detriment, unless someone has an instance to recall, to them being as I fitted them. Probably / maybe isn’t argument enough when I see them in and working and if they were airlocked at the top you’d be able to hear it. The ones I have in currently are running perfectly well and silently ( bar the noise of the adjacent pump ).

 

I doubt you'd hear any noise from that big air pocket, as the water is just going to flow undisturbed across to the "inlet" being used as an outlet.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...