Jump to content
  • entries
    5
  • comments
    45
  • views
    1007

Tree matters…


Dreadnaught

2646 views

As I mentioned in my last post, as one of my very first actions I feel that I need to talk to my arboriculturalist. I think that many subsequent decisions depend on his answers.

 

My small plot (20m x 20m) has a chesntnut tree on its border and its roots are to be preserved. Those roots spread under about half my plot. And it is the half between my access gate and where the dwelling will be so exactly in the wrong place. Everything will travel across the roots. And the root zone is almost also the only location on the plot where I can stoer things during the build (other than inside the dwelling of course). 

 

I have a whole host of questions for my tree guy,

  1. I have a couple of possible routes across the plot for the drains and services. Which is the better one for the trees?
  2. When it comes to the build, how can I arrange storage on site without damaging any tree roots? For example, the plot has an existing area of old block driveway right in front of the gate and over the roots. Should I keep it and use it for storage during the build? Or lift it out and put some other root-protection surface down instead?
  3. Should I take any root-friendly precautions when I clear the plot?
  4. I am having screw-pile foundations but how deep can I scrape and level the plot, particularly as I have about 40 cm of height difference across the plot (lumps and bumps, not a consistent gradient).
  5. When to clear the vegetation (otherwise known as “the jungle” from the plot)? Any precautions to take? How to stop weeds regrowing.
  6. There are quite few derelict low-level brick and concrete structures on the plot, mainly consisting of the foundations for long-since-gone greenhouse? Should I just rip everything out, or should be concerned about tree roots in doing so?
  7. In particular there is an old concrete water tank sunk deep into the ground (like a water butt from the ‘50s, about 1 meter square, open to the sky). It has what seems to be a land drain running into it. What to do with that?

12 Comments


Recommended Comments

This is interesting :

 

And the root zone is almost also the only location on the plot where I can store things during the build
 

Most approvals have a specific clause about having to use fencing to BS5837 and not doing anything inside the area. 
 

Out of curiosity, is the RPA as measured on your plans or as defined ..?? It should be based on a circle of radius 12 times the diameter of the main stem measured at 1.5m above the ground. 
 

You may want to ask the arborist about the root area, specifically with in light of this clause. 
 

4.6.3 Any deviation in the RPA from the original circular plot should take account of the following factors whilst still providing adequate protection for the root system:
a) the morphology and disposition of the roots, when influenced by past or existing site conditions (e.g. the presence of roads, structures and underground apparatus);
b) topography and drainage;
c) the soil type and structure;
d) the likely tolerance of the tree to root disturbance or damage, based on factors such as species, age, condition and past management.

 

It is more than likely that the old structures have altered the root pattern so having those superimposed on the RPA is always beneficial. I’ve argued successfully that an RPA could not be a certain area due to presence of a building previously. 
 

For an RPA to be a 10m circle the tree in question would need to be at least 0.85m diameter (or nearly 2.6m in circumference) so I would start by getting that validated. 

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, Triassic said:

Best get it cut down asap, or find another plot.

 

I appreciate your frank comment but overall I am confident we'll find a way to work within the root-protection area. I think I have chosen a good practical arborist. And we have already had one site meeting with the LPA tree officer (with one more to go). Lets see if it will drive me to distraction!

 

28 minutes ago, PeterW said:

Out of curiosity, is the RPA as measured on your plans or as defined ..?? It should be based on a circle of radius 12 times the diameter of the main stem measured at 1.5m above the ground. 

 

I am no expert of course but I believe that the RPA has indeed been defined in the AIA* according to the standard that cite. The AIA was a key document in obtaining the planing approval. And now that I have panning approval, the next step is to write the full AMA* and TPP* and have them agreed with the LPA tree officer.

 

30 minutes ago, PeterW said:

It is more than likely that the old structures have altered the root pattern

 

Fully agree. Hopeful of retaining use for storage of a substantial area within the RPA.

 

31 minutes ago, PeterW said:

For an RPA to be a 10m circle the tree in question would need to be at least 0.85m diameter

 

Sounds about right for this tree. It is a big fat old chestnut.

 

*

AIA = Arboricultural impact assessment.

AMA = Arboricultural Method statement.

TPP = Tree Protection Plan.

 

Link to comment

I would fell the trees you don’t want to retain and ask about root protection for those you keep afterwards, our trees/hedges required a 2m root protection area I simply fenced with sheep fencing. Council wanted a proper arbor. survey but after talking to the councils tree “person” because we had no “significant” trees he agreed a simple exclusion zone was ok.

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, joe90 said:

 

I would fell the trees you don’t want to retain

 

 

Yes, quite right, we will be removing two small trees that are within the footprint of the dwelling. Just to be clear, there are no other trees on my plot. The big chestnut tree is just across the fence. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Just now, Russell griffiths said:

Have you considered getting somebody out with an air spade to do an assessment of the root spread. 

 

Good idea. I will add it to my list of questions.

Link to comment

@Dreadnaught Thanks for the blog post.

I am very interested to hear what answers you got back from your tree guy as I have many similar questions running round in my head regarding my own upcoming build.

Hopefully it will will help clear the fog a little ? 

 

Thanks.

Link to comment

Hi @Field_of_Dreams, oh yes, what in particular interests you.

 

In general I have found that most things are possible, they just need to be framed in the right way for the council tree officer. And moreover, its all well and good to have a detailed arboricultural method statement (AMS) but I get the impression that the reality on the ground is likely to be flexible.

 

Having said all of this, I am still waiting for the council to sign-off on my planning conditions, which includes the AMS that was drafted for me by my tree specialist.

Link to comment

Thanks @Dreadnaught

It was points, 1/3/4/5/6 that are applicable to my plot.

I am looking at my groundworks at present and it seems to be heading towards piles but I don't have a GI report yet. I seem to change my mind every other day at present! Some say that it is not needed and just put the money towards the piles but I have also started to look at vibro stone columns and from what I understand, they need a GI report. I am hoping to get some time to talk to one or two suppliers today so hopefully that will help.

I am also waiting on several quotes to come back in to hopefully make things  a bit clearer too.

 

I also have an archeological watch on my plot so need to be very efficient on site to reduce those costs. 

As always...more questions than answers at this stage ?

 

Link to comment

@Field_of_Dreams, yes. On all of those points I turned out that it was possible for my tree specialist to draft the Method Statement to accommodate whatever I wanted. I was quite surprised and pleased. It seems almost anything is possible and, so long as you choose a good expert, he can make almost anything work.

 

I do not know if all of the tree experts are like my one, but he was recommended to me by another self-builder as someone who would "be on my side", which I am now coming to appreciate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...