Jump to content
  • entries
    53
  • comments
    404
  • views
    7867

Steel, beams and a problem


vivienz

2635 views

Let's start with the problem.  I can't solve it today as today is a public holiday in RoI and the MBC guy I need to speak to isn't available, so there's nothing doing until tomorrow.

 

I need to get the scaffolding sorted for when the timber frame team arrive on 27th August and thought I had this well in hand.  I sort of still do, but there's a H&S problem with the scaffold erection and I've spent a little time this morning tracing back to the source of the error.  I need a single lift of scaffolding for the construction of the attached single storey flat roof garage that is at the north east corner of the building.  On the topographical survey that was done for the property by the vendor (for the planning permission that he sold it with), some overhead power cables are shown nearby and the building was designed so that the far corner of the garage cleared these.  So far so good.  All the setting out and construction has been done according to this.  Now, lack of observation on my part, but it is now obvious that instead of clearing the north east corner of the garage by a couple of metres, the OH cables are, in fact, directly overhead of that corner and where the scaffolding would be.

 

I had a look on the topo survey and the OH cables are incorrectly plotted - they are shown further out than they are in reality, so I'm not sure if this is collective responsibility, or who's it is.  I'm not really interested in attributing blame to anyone at this stage, I'd rather just find a solution that gets the house and garage built within the current schedule.

 

The issue is this - the cables are high tension and the scaffolder's original suggestion has proved to be a no-goer as the DNO has said that the cables are very high voltage and would just burn through any shrouding. Alternatively, they could switch off the supply running through these cables, but it would have to be for the entire time that the scaffolding is in place.  I didn't even bother asking for a price on this as it's probably more than the build cost.

 

Where do I go from here? Well, I need to speak with MBC tomorrow and find out if the garage can be built without scaffolding, or if there is some other way around this.  Although all access and materials are coming in away from the OH cables, the concern for the scaffolders is if they make contact with a pole whilst putting the stuff up, or if the power arcs down to one being waved in the air.  I have no idea of the likelihood of any of this, but I really wouldn't want to be responsible for an impromptu barbeque.  Of a person.  Update to follow.

 

And so onto EPS and beams. I have to say that all that EPS on a sunny day is enough to burn your retinas out.  It really is quite painful to look at, even when you're trying not to, and it doesn't do much for the already hot temperatures out there on site.  You know it's serious when your construction workers are all wearing sunnies, as they're not a vain bunch.

 

1284458363_EPSwhiteout.thumb.jpg.fb1fd6725b89d24f438c9ab8596122ba.jpg

 

The trestles you can see are what they use to rest the rebar sections on before sliding on the steel rings then tying it together with wire before putting in situ and adding the rest of the rings.  The blue polythene that you can see is the DPM/radon barrier sheet.

 

310319508_Bentpilesteels.thumb.jpg.2e9a7d298ed451b8f377e717255102c6.jpg

 

This is the head of the pile that was previously cut to height.  A hole is sawn through the EPS for the pile head to extend into, then the steels from the piles are bent over so that they can be lapped with the rebar forming the ring beam.  Fruit pastilles are optional.

 

2143744104_EPSandbeamlayout.thumb.jpg.1aa570c620df313e273147bd6b8b8a95.jpg

 

The steel protrusions lapping over the EPS will get tied into steel mesh, and the two will overlap by at least 500mm.  The channels in the EPS are where other beams will go.  The EPS offcuts are just being used as spacers to keep the sheets that are down in the right place.

 

206371290_piletiedintoringbeam.thumb.jpg.dd0dbc245ab847b28c26548c9449fe79.jpg

 

Here, you can see where the steels from the pile are tied into the ring beam.  Bear in mind that every single bit of wire that you can see is twisted on by hand.  It makes my hands hurt just thinking about it.

 

In the main open plan living room area, the west and north facing aspects both have lift and slide doors that need to be recessed into the floor so that the threshold is level.  To allow for this, there are indents in the perimeter beams where the windows will go.

 

1148879521_ringbeamdoorindent.thumb.jpg.9918f25ecd3c7fed09e960a9d1929f2c.jpg

 

This is the westward facing window; you can see that the building is oriented just over 10 degrees off the main compass points by the fall of my shadow - the photo was taken about 9.30 this morning.

 

And one more photo of the pile steel lapped with the ring beam.

 

849316422_piletiedtoringbeam2.thumb.jpg.efe1f2b36521f3f72df3e7a32d0c57bf.jpg

 

The rest of the steels will take all of today and all of tomorrow, then there is the UFH pipe to be laid.  Once all the steels are done, the building control bod needs to come and check that he's happy with all the tying in.  Once that's okayed, then the concrete can be ordered and poured. I'm hoping it will be Thursday as we're due some rain at the weekend, by which time, I'll hopefully have some progress on my scaffolding problem.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

23 Comments


Recommended Comments

@vivienz when I was speaking to PYC about scaffolding, they mentioned that they can erect a single story without scaffolding if needed, using a fork lift or something similar, and could place other safety features, such as crash mats and air safety mattresses, to protect any workers working at height without scaffolding. Hope you can find a similar solution.

 

Great photos!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Your overhead cable worries me, and may be more of an issue than you thought.

 

It looks like 11KV, the standard for local distribution, and your supply will come from a transformer from that quite often pole mounted.

 

We have 11KV overhead lines just the other side of the road from us.  The "issue" they cause is restrictions on how close you can build to them.  I found this out when a neighbour wanted to build almost right up to the road edge, putting his building 4 metres from the OH lines. He was told NO.  As it happens, there was some network alterations going on, and he was able to piggyback onto that, and get the section past his plot undergrounded for a much reduced cost as they were making alterations anyway, so he was able to build.

 

When I looked into out own build, I was concerned it might cause us a problem. So I enquired of SSE the DNO here and was told no work within 9 metres of the OH line.  Then when you drill down into the details, it is actually no building within 6 metres of the line, and any work (scaffold, cranes, diggers) between 6 and 9 metres from the line you have to be particularly careful.

So we have built 6 metres from the OH line and had scaffold up 5 metres from it, and used a digger (carefully) right under it.

 

The fact it has ended up right above your building is a concern. Has your DNO agreed to that? I would want that in writing.  What is the clearance from your roof to the line at the closest point?  IF it's less than about 3 metres I suspect you are going to need a line shutdown just for the roofer to work on the roof. And taking the actual build, that could be a long shutdown, and who else would be off during that shutdown.

 

This may not be what you want to hear, but a diversion or undergrounding of a section of the line is what you really want but that is going to cost well into 4 digits.

 

It might be cheaper to move the garage. There will be some wasted money on foundations that will have to be moved but that is likely less cost than moving the line. You might have to re submit planning but should be able to continue building the house while that goes through.

 

Perhaps start a thread in the forum to discuss this rather then clog up your blog?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment

Thanks, Dave.  Our supply doesn't come from that pole, it's currently an OH supply via the neighbours.  I don't know the destination of the problematic one, but it does trouble me at the moment.  Before demolishing, there were already sheds with hard standing directly underneath the line, but I doubt that counts for much at present.

 

For the time being, I shall see what MBC have to say about it once they're back, then open it up for further input if necessary.

Link to comment

You could erect the roof trusses, complete with tiles and gutter etc on the garage slab, then jack it up to the correct height and build the walls up to meet the roof. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Instead of a truss roof would a flat roof solve the height issue. The walls can be put up inside as normal then joists from the inside as well of trestles. Easy job then to sheet the roof out and cover it with what ever finish you choose.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Triassic said:

You could erect the roof trusses, complete with tiles and gutter etc on the garage slab, then jack it up to the correct height and build the walls up to meet the roof. 

This might sound a strange idea but it’s based on a substation we built under power lines. Due to clearance issues we couldn’t erect scaffold, so we did as described above.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Thanks, both.  The garage is designed to have a flat roof, so I won't need to make any changes in that respect.

Link to comment

So if it's a flat roof why do they need a full height scaffold??

They can easily use the trestles at full height to spread the roof joists and set up the ply/OSB roof covering.

Or maybe they aren't allowed to work of trestles.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

It's the scaffold erector that has raised the issue, not MBC. MBC are off today, back office at least, so I will be able to check with them tomorrow for a workaround.

Link to comment

The ground floor is about 180 square metres, 120 upstairs.  We told the architect that we wanted larger rooms, not more rooms, and the downstairs is very open plan.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

A well documented record of what is photographed above. Hopefully the issue causing you concern will blow over once you talk to the guys in the morning. The others above have suggested alternatives and I'm sure the builders will work off trestles. I know our stone man is and is happy to do so as our scaffolding went a week or so ago.

 

edited for typos.

Edited by Redoctober
  • Like 1
Link to comment

We did our garage with  trestles not scaff.  Its a flat roof. It wasnt a problem.  Its a detached garage. We didnt have MBC do the garage though we built that in block and brick. Good luck.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

I know an arborist who works maintaining safe vegetation distances around power lines. They operate with large cautious safety margins and these are designed to cope with exceptional conditions such as hot weather when the lines can stretch and droop, also an HT cable can spark to earth over a larger distance when humidity is high. The industry is highly regulated and they don't mess around with the safety distances, the last casualty he encountered was a dead horse.

Edited by epsilonGreedy
  • Sad 1
Link to comment

I'm sure we'll get there.  Directly under the wires, there was already a concrete hard standing for some sheds that disintegrated over the last couple of years.  Also, the wires continue over our field and an access track for the farm next door.  The farm workers regularly go scooting along the track in a JCB with loads of animal feed in the raised up bucket and I haven't seen any crispy farmers lying around, so we should be able to work something out.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment

The clearance under the line will be enough for normal road traffic, you can probably look it up but that will be a minimum of about 5 metres.  It would not surprise me if the standard height of the poles is 6 metres, hence the "no build" distance being 6 metres so if the pole fell over the line would not hit the building.

 

In the unlikely event of a pole failing in this case, the line could come into contact with the building. Ouch. :ph34r:

 

Rules change over time. In the past houses were build under pylons (talking 205KV or more) I am sure that is no longer allowed.  I used to regularly drive past a nice neat row of bungalows but one of them was stepped back from the rest because it had a 132KV pylon in the front garden.

 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, ProDave said:

The clearance under the line will be enough for normal road traffic, you can probably look it up but that will be a minimum of about 5 metres.  It would not surprise me if the standard height of the poles is 6 metres, hence the "no build" distance being 6 metres so if the pole fell over the line would not hit the building.

 

Those rules have started to be applied to wind turbines and I have seen a couple of reasonably sized ones refused as if they fell they would be onto a road.

 

National Grid used to produce a guidance document for developers about developing near power lines but I can't find it on the website

Link to comment
1 hour ago, PeterW said:

Those rules have started to be applied to wind turbines and I have seen a couple of reasonably sized ones refused as if they fell they would be onto a road.

 

And up here I’ve seen several that have blown over within a few miles of here. The latest one I saw was one of a pair on the local sports ground. Lucky no one was hurt tbh. 

Link to comment

Ouch. My comments. I feel focused slightly on possible regulatory action.

 

1 - We had some of these moved, but may have been 33kV, when we did our big PP. We were faced with having a swathe through the middle which was pretty much house width. Fortunately we had a Wayleave with the right to make them move it all. There is a thread somewhere which explains the stuff, but this is oversailing so different.

 

2 - The process to switch it off is IMO a nonstarter. There may well be 500 or more people supplied by that, and to do such work *must* have a long process. Lots of notices, consultation, applications etc. Takes months to plan if not emergency. unless something is happening already.

 

3 - You have practical alternatives which is good, if you are allowed to use them. the jack up option is like putting your first floor on acroprops to repair the downstairs wall. Parents did that to a listed building and rebuilt a whole facade. Perfectly normal technique, but you may need a bit of redesign on the roof as it will need to be self-supporting.

 

4 - You need some more piccies showing where the thing is in reality, taken along the line of the wire to see the actual distance from the house. If you have a known dimension in the pics it would help so the distance can be estimated. Could be something very simple such as a known 2 or 4m piece of wood on trestles level with the closest point. it may be beneficial to put a time lapse camera on it along the line if you have them around, so you can see how far it moves in any wind that comes along.

 

5 - I think at some point you are going to need to talk to the LPA, and there is a risk that someone may just try and say no (though I think they will be sympathetic). It might be beneficial talking to your been-round-the-block wise owl just for their feel for the situation; it will have happened before though only occasionally.

 

Since you have an architect it might be worth asking them if they have had one, or to call in a favour or ask their oldest local architect friend. An alternative might be a quiet chat with an old hand at building control, or even someone in the electricity company, but personally I would want an informal idea first from someone not links.

 

6 - I would perhaps avoid spending money on the garage bits for now until you have a better idea which direction this is going. Sure you have done that anyway. The rub is that some stuff is interdependent of course, and you cannot do eg the slab in 2 bites.

 

7 - If it is a comfort, I do not think that the LPA will stop you In your tracks as long as you are not doing something in specific violation of THEIR requirements. IMO the ones with the big spanner will be the utility, but they will want a workable solution too.

 

As this must happen sometimes, I am sure there are ways .. just takes a bit of work to find them.

 

Ferdinand

Edited by Ferdinand
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

If you go for the jack it up option, I’d use GRP to cover the flat roof, you wouldn’t want to have to go to repair a leak in felt.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

For mbc purposes I see no reason why the highest point of scaffolding would be higher than what they're building.  The roof membrane installers should have a high hand rail...but given its single storey and not exactly urban they'd probably 'overlook' it, especially if you had air bags/crash mats.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...